EPCOT Test Track to be reimagined

Poseidon Quest

Well-Known Member
Just watched a POV. I wasn't anticipating much for this new version, but I'm actually pleasantly surprised. It's not perfect and I'll have to wait to ride it in person for a true assessment, but this seems like a 2025 interpretation of the classic Epcot spirit. That's a huge improvement to me and I hope that positive feedback and reception for an original attraction makes Disney listen.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
EPCOT has generally always had a vaguely of-the-moment futuristic vibe for its Future World queues. You could argue that it no longer cuts it and isn’t as inspiring as it aims to be, but you’re really comparing intentionally unlike things. It’s not as if Disney cannot build a highly themed fantasy queue; they just don’t typically do so in Future World by design.

I’m comparing recent e ticket level attractions. What is unkike about that? This is literally the top three attraction in epcot… and that’s what you get?

This “future world queue” limitation is some nonsense. Even space mountain is more interesting then this. The reason future world queues were so basic in the past is because they basically didn’t have long extended themed queues due to their massive capacities. They were designed for high turnover.

But this is 2025… look at what they did with nemo in TLS… they weren’t bound by the past to stick to a white box. Even GoTG at least tried to be techy with the lighting and curves… and it’s second phase has preshow elements and effects. M:s has entire scenes and more.

The point of the photos is queues in this decade are an extended part of the show… especially with eticket level attractions.

People here are fawning over their local community college presentation on their student projects
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
I’m comparing recent e ticket level attractions. What is unkike about that? This is literally the top three attraction in epcot… and that’s what you get?

This “future world queue” limitation is some nonsense. Even space mountain is more interesting then this. The reason future world queues were so basic in the past is because they basically didn’t have long extended themed queues due to their massive capacities. They were designed for high turnover.

But this is 2025… look at what they did with nemo in TLS… they weren’t bound by the past to stick to a white box. Even GoTG at least tried to be techy with the lighting and curves… and it’s second phase has preshow elements and effects. M:s has entire scenes and more.

The point of the photos is queues in this decade are an extended part of the show… especially with eticket level attractions.

People here are fawning over their local community college presentation on their student projects
I’m saying that they’re not trying to do the same thing at all. As I mentioned, you’re welcome to criticize the strategy, but I think that the comparison is largely pointless; we all know that the Harry Potter environments being mimicked are inherently fantastic and impressive whereas Future World has always had a more grounded aesthetic based on World’s Fairs. It’s cool to hope they go in a different direction, but it’s a bit disingenuous to side-by-side the images as if one represents the type of queue Disney builds versus the type of queue Universal builds. Disney builds fantasy queues competently when that is the aim.
 

JackCH

Well-Known Member
I’m saying that they’re not trying to do the same thing at all. As I mentioned, you’re welcome to criticize the strategy, but I think that the comparison is largely pointless; we all know that the Harry Potter environments being mimicked are inherently fantastic and impressive whereas Future World has always had a more grounded aesthetic based on Worlds Fairs. It’s cool to hope they go in a different direction, but it’s a bit disingenuous to side-by-side the images as if one represents the type of queue Disney builds versus the type of queue Universal builds. Disney builds fantasy queues competently when that is the aim.
The better comparison for a recent queue would probably be RotR.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
The idea of a worlds fair was replaced ages ago… this is themed IPcot now. If they are going to just do a theme park at least be good at it

Fair enough. But they were aiming for worlds fair with queues (well guardians, I’m merely reacting to a picture of the TT one).

You are a proponent of fully shirking the Worlds Fair.

My gut reaction is Guardians presents itself as the best of version of a current worlds fair pavilion and the GM one is merely on the level.

And just so it doesn’t present itself as shilling, that’s not my intent. I just wanted to quote myself that this was my description of Osaka that I just concurrently had this conversation a bit over a week ago.

Expect to have no expectations, go with what strikes your fancy. It really is a lot like a new version of Future World (not showcase) and I’d describe a lot of the larger pavilions more like walking through the Cosmic Rewind Queue or walking through portions of living with the land. It’s neat enough and the exterior architecture of the pavilions are varying shades of cool.
 

monothingie

The Most Positive Member on the Forum ™
Premium Member
For sure, Rise of the Resistance. They just can’t (won’t?) keep it running at full functionality. I’m not personally as high on Guardians, but it gets really high praise from everyone I talk to about it.
Except the ride system for Guardians is third party.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
I’m saying that they’re not trying to do the same thing at all. As I mentioned, you’re welcome to criticize the strategy, but I think that the comparison is largely pointless; we all know that the Harry Potter environments being mimicked are inherently fantastic and impressive whereas Future World has always had a more grounded aesthetic based on World’s Fairs. It’s cool to hope they go in a different direction, but it’s a bit disingenuous to side-by-side the images as if one represents the type of queue Disney builds versus the type of queue Universal builds. Disney builds fantasy queues competently when that is the aim.

I think you are focusing on the details and missing the message. Like i said… look at space mountain. It is not built out line MoM yet is far more of an experience than this thing.

Your argument boils down to “they can when they want to”. Ok, why don’t they want a world class experience for test track?
 

Vinnie Mac

Well-Known Member
Another thing I wanna mention is that I absolutely love the soundtrack for this ride. Easily one of my favorite original pieces of music written specifically for Epcot in recent years. It's so optimistic and inspiring and it's bery fitting for modern day Epcot in the best way possible. I need it on streaming immediately!

On a more sappy note, I think the optimistic and forward thinking spirit of this ride is such a breathe of fresh air in an era of time where we are surrounded by doomerism and nihilism. It's easy to feel like we don't have much to look forward to in the future but we really do and there is lots of exciting technology on the horizon that I think will affect our daily lives in positive ways. The world could certainly use more optimism.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
Your argument boils down to “they can when they want to”. Ok, why don’t they want a world class experience for test track?
They want the look they built. Lots of people also don’t like the similar aesthetic of Creations, Connections, Guardians, etc. Your argument is that such a thing doesn’t look world class, which is a fair opinion, but I don’t think it’s the way it is because they explicitly don’t want it to be world class.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
My gut reaction is Guardians presents itself as the best of version of a current worlds fair pavilion and the GM one is merely on the level.

And just so it doesn’t present itself as shilling, that’s not my intent. I just wanted to quote myself that this was my description of Osaka that I just concurrently had this conversation a bit over a week ago.

I think it’s quite yhe backflip to frame cosmic rewind in a WF image. It has that kind of cosmetic… but not that story, purpose, or takeaway.

And I am not a proponent of taking away the WF.. i’m just saying whatever they chose, do it well. I am not hating on the pivot, i am saying the product is weak.

where is the reride value in this attraction? It is still just this flat coaster experience. The lidar scene is something people will continue to lime but the rest is filler. I mean… they redid the same projection gimmick THREE times in a row.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
They want the look they built. Lots of people also don’t like the similar aesthetic of Creations, Connections, Guardians, etc. Your argument is that such a thing doesn’t look world class, which is a fair opinion, but I don’t think it’s the way it is because they explicitly don’t want it to be world class.

if this is what they aspire to… then they got deeper issues. Because this is run of the mill… not industry leading
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
I think it’s quite yhe backflip to frame cosmic rewind in a WF image. It has that kind of cosmetic… but not that story, purpose, or takeaway.

Again, this was my pre-established opinion. I’m not doing a backflip for you, I wrote it weeks ago. I just thought it was funny timing and worth mentioning.

Osaka is shockingly not really like Epcot of yore. Nor I imagine Expos of the 60’s. It was all vibes and feels and very little actual information or substance. Like current Epcot. Probably worse than Cosmic Rewind, because they are trying to go so multilingual that there isn’t much concrete information.

where is the reride value in this attraction? It is still just this flat coaster experience. The lidar scene is something people will continue to lime but the rest is filler. I mean… they redid the same projection gimmick THREE times in a row.

I have not watched the ride video or a queue line walkthrough. I have nothing to add.
 

James Alucobond

Well-Known Member
if this is what they aspire to… then they got deeper issues. Because this is run of the mill… not industry leading
It’s not about what they “aspire to”, which is my point. They can obviously set their sights much higher in terms of complexity and fantasy and pull it off. They do regularly. It is about their perception of what EPCOT is and what it should look like; the murals in both TT3.0 and Connections are clear attempts to recapture a certain aesthetic alongside more modern finishes and fixtures. Your opinion is that this is not particularly effective or desirable and is inherently unimpressive, but it has nothing to do with them being “unambitious” E-tickets and everything to do with them existing in a particular space at WDW.
 

ChrisFL

Premium Member
Again, this was my pre-established opinion. I’m not doing a backflip for you, I wrote it weeks ago. I just thought it was funny timing and worth mentioning.

Osaka is shockingly not really like Epcot of yore. Nor I imagine Expos of the 60’s. It was all vibes and feels and very little actual information or substance. Like current Epcot. Probably worse than Cosmic Rewind, because they are trying to go so multilingual that there isn’t much concrete information.



I have not watched the ride video or a queue line walkthrough. I have nothing to add.

I was at Osaka Expo this year as well and I agree, LOTS of vibes and little substance, but some pavilions were WAY nicer than others (South Korea being a huge letdown and Malaysia being SUPER nice IMO)....but that's off topic :)
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom