MK Cars-Themed Attractions at Magic Kingdom

JackCH

Well-Known Member
Would it help if those of us who criticize Disney created a “great things I enjoyed at Disney” thread? I have a great time visiting the parks - but still criticize decisions I simply don’t understand. (typing this from Disneyland)
Let’s get all the “pixie dusters” to start a “what we don’t like about Disney” thread and all the cynics start a “what we still like about Disney” thread and watch as world peace ensues.
 

donaldtoo

Well-Known Member
Disney songs are not really bound by time, but rather by style. Ragtime piano players, Dapper Dans, Voices of Liberty, all sing Disney songs in the era that fits.

The biggest issue time wise is the modern fender style guitar for friend in me.

I get that, and have heard them all. They’ve all been doing that since their day one.
Country Bears just seems like a bit of an outlier to me, as it’s an animatronic character show that’s been around for decades, and the “out-of-the-blue” changeover was a bit jolting.

The guitar he’s “playing” is a Fender Telecaster. They came out in 1951, and are used extensively in Country Music. Not sure what that says…?! 🤷‍♂️
 

mattpeto

Well-Known Member
It’s not hypocrisy in the slightest.

I will stack my fondness for and knowledge of Disney against yours any day of the week. Refusing to engage critically with a topic isn’t a sign of affection.

So much fondess coming from you, we can all feel it.

Look I admire your knowledge and you're as articulate as any poster here. But you literally hate every decision Disney makes these days.

I'm glad this place gives you safe space to endless complain and bicker about it all. I don't hate my hobbies and neither do you.

But I think most is just a front: your annual pass is an endorsement that you enjoy the parks and don't hate everything. And that you'll be back again and again.

You aren't the only one.
 

donaldtoo

Well-Known Member
What, You actually expect a theme park to have an actual master plan in regard to it's theming? The Parks are clearly just glorified billboards that promote whatever Disney's latest acquisition or franchise is. That's the way Iger sees them and will remain at least while he is CEO and likely continue if the company picks the next CEO in-house.

As it stands, these days, I can’t disagree with that.
 

Casper Gutman

Well-Known Member
So much fondess coming from you, we can all feel it.

Look I admire your knowledge and you're as articulate as any poster here. But you literally hate every decision Disney makes these days.

I'm glad this place gives you safe space to endless complain and bicker about it all. I don't hate my hobbies and neither do you.

But I think most is just a front: your annual pass is an endorsement that you enjoy the parks and don't hate everything. And that you'll be back again and again.

You aren't the only one.
I was going to compose a much longer post here, but I think it’s enough to say that you have a deep and profound misunderstanding of many of the conversations and posters here.
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
Would it help if those of us who criticize Disney created a “great things I enjoyed at Disney” thread?

I've done a few, and can do more if people want


 

mattpeto

Well-Known Member
I was going to compose a much longer post here, but I think it’s enough to say that you have a deep and profound misunderstanding of many of the conversations and posters here.
You're probably right and I respect that.

As someone is mostly excited about the projects, it's hard to endure the endless criticism.

I don't feel RoA is some sacred ground like most of you. It's more important out at West (especially with Fantasmic!).

I'd be aggravated if they were filling in World Showcase. You got me there.
 

Agent H

Well-Known Member
Would it help if those of us who criticize Disney created a “great things I enjoyed at Disney” thread? I have a great time visiting the parks - but still criticize decisions I simply don’t understand. (typing this from Disneyland)
I would unironically like to see that. Not because I think everyone’s a negative Nancy but because I feel like it would be fun for everyone. That’s why I create threads like these https://forums.wdwmagic.com/threads/best-thing-at-each-disney-park-post-2010.985504/
 

SamusAranX

Well-Known Member
I would agree the company as a whole doesn’t have the same quality of films as it used to.

But for the parks- there are more rides and attractions today my family loves than there was 20 years ago. We still make great memories there and love staying on property. It remains our favorite getaway, and we overall are excited about the newly announced things even though I wish it was expansion rather than replacement.

And I admire other posters’ views of the park as art and history and the insightful critiques, but I ultimately think Disney World is about families having fun together. And honestly? I think my family will have more fun in the cars area than RoA, and that’s what it comes down to to me.
Legit question and I don’t mean this in a snarky way; but why do you and your family still stay at the resort properties; having seen the subtraction of value offset by the additional costs the past few years?
 

JackCH

Well-Known Member
Legit question and I don’t mean this in a snarky way; but why do you and your family still stay at the resort properties; having seen the subtraction of value offset by the additional costs the past few years?
Costs are up at all the hotels in Orlando, inside or outside the property. You can still get deals as pass holders/Florida residents that are pretty good if you know how to look and make the difference a lot less stark. The value of the theming of the resorts, the convenience to parks, not having to deal with parking, etc, are still worth it to us.

At the end of the day, staying at Port Orleans Riverside (our normal go-to) makes our Disney vacations feel much more “magical” than if we stayed off property. You still have the theming, the towels in Disney shapes, and a lot of other little things that we feel still makes the additional cost worth it.

We don’t do it every time as we are a family on a budget, but we notice a marked increase of enjoyment staying on property rather than off.
 

donaldtoo

Well-Known Member
Last set was mostly from the 1950's.

Certainly was the heyday of folks driving out and visiting national parks.

CBJ was originally designed for the Mineral King Ski Resort in Cali, that never came to fruition.
The resort would have opened in the late 60’s, or so. I know Marc Davis was heavily involved in the design of CBJ.
I’ve always associated Frontierland with old west frontier, but after MKSR was cancelled, they didn’t wanna’ shelve CBJ, so Frontierland was the most logical place to locate it.
It opened on Oct. 1st, 1971.
So, there’s a bit of a disconnect there, but nothing compared to this “Cars” modern off-road racing thing.
 

Tha Realest

Well-Known Member
Disney DOES NOT HAVE TO REPLACE OLD ATTRACTIONS TO BUILD NEW ONES. That is a CHOICE, and it is a choice they ONLY make regularly in Florida, the resort in which there is the LEAST reason to make that choice.
I have a theory that WDW internally has a finite cap on how high they will permit their operational costs to go. It’s why I think we’re seeing a replacement of operationally (think Splash Mountain AA maintenance, River boat operations) or entertainment CM intensive attractions. And it’s why we’re not seeing much in the way of classic expansion that extends out the footprint or requires big increases in staffing.
 

donaldtoo

Well-Known Member
How is something being more opening ended ridiculously convoluted?

Adventureland isn't set in one time period ... Fantasyland isn't set it one time period, tomorrow land isn't set in one time period

Why is it now convoluted for Frontierland to be more expansive in its scope?

Adventureland implies general adventure, no matter the time or place.
Fantasyland implies general fantasy, no matter the time or place.
Tomorrowland implies general tomorrow, no matter the time or place, as long as it’s tomorrow.
Again, Frontierland, to me anyway, implies old west frontier (around 1870) and that’s the way it was originally all set up, sans the already discussed CBJ.
Everything from Pecos Bill to BTMR to ROA and the Liberty Belle to TSI, etc. were all themed for that era.
Heck, if it’s all suddenly such an “open-ended frontier” now, Iger should buy the rights to Star Trek, ‘cause you know…”Space: the final frontier”, and shoehorn an attraction based on that in there.
Where does the “open-ended” end…?!?!?!
Might as well just rename it “Whateverland”.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom