doombuggy999
Active Member
He's not a real doctor, but he is a real worm.Who did he want? Dr. Worm?
He's not a real doctor, but he is a real worm.Who did he want? Dr. Worm?
The fog that was originally there and the big lift seems to be gone forever, though.
An actual worm. He lives like a worm.He's not a real doctor, but he is a real worm.
They should hear that dude out and do the opposite next time.I doubt they ever considered making the attraction a book report (I think Frederick Chambers' pitch was,
California still has the mist but it looks like WDW's is gone for good.Wait, stop, I'm sorry. Are you kidding me? The big amazing swamp fog (or whatever) effect they touted for months that turned out to just be poorly positioned mist machines is just... gone?? So, like, the main lift is just... colored lights now? Good lord.
Courtesy of ChatGPT:Just realized, the "Louis looking in and under logs" is probably left over from the original storyline. Why would musicians be under a log? Who did he want? Dr. Worm?
“Splash needs to be replaced because it’s in such bad shape.”California still has the mist but it looks like WDW's is gone for good.
Can't wait to see what Tiana's looks like in thirty years! Off to a great start!“Splash needs to be replaced because it’s in such bad shape.”
Well, the effects and lighting would be broken by now...Hey, imagine a lift hill with Dr. Faciliar singing "Are you ready?" With effects and lighting mimicking what is depicted in the film?
Imagine...
"Come ride the ride, where you'll see almost nothing you recognize from the film you love!"It really is quite impressive how they've neglected this IP with a namesake attraction that's riddled with issues and lacks any resemblance to the movie. Can't fix it so they're just letting it slowly waste away.
If it even makes it that long!Can't wait to see what Tiana's looks like in thirty years! Off to a great start!
It would be closer to having Jasmine absent. In your analogy, Aladdin is equivalent to Tiana.It still baffles me that Naveen, one of the film's main characters, is a non-entity in this ride while Mama Odie is the most focused-on character from the film in the ride aside from Tiana and maybe Louis. It's like doing an Aladdin ride where the only characters who even so much as talk are Jasmine, the Genie, and Iago while Aladdin only makes a brief cameo near the end.
Tiana - 7 appearances (4 animatronic, 1 limited movement figure, 1 screen, 1 voice only)It still baffles me that Naveen, one of the film's main characters, is a non-entity in this ride while Mama Odie is the most focused-on character from the film in the ride aside from Tiana and maybe Louis. It's like doing an Aladdin ride where the only characters who even so much as talk are Jasmine, the Genie, and Iago while Aladdin only makes a brief cameo near the end.
I said Jasmine because she's the marketable princess who sells dolls and Halloween costumes like Tiana - ergo, Disney would probably be more likely to give her a greater presence in the ride than Aladdin (unless it was a book report).It would be closer to having Jasmine absent. In your analogy, Aladdin is equivalent to Tiana.
Isn't it only one voice only appearance? We hear her shouting at us just before we go down Slippin' Falls, then we get two screens, then the two animatronics... am I forgetting something?Mama Odie - 6 appearances (2 animatronic, 2 screens, 2 voice only)
You're correct. I was mistaking her dialog at the top of the big plunge for a 2nd disembodied Odie.I said Jasmine because she's the marketable princess who sells dolls and Halloween costumes like Tiana - ergo, Disney would probably be more likely to give her a greater presence in the ride than Aladdin (unless it was a book report).
Isn't it only one voice only appearance? We hear her shouting at us just before we go down Slippin' Falls, then we get two screens, then the two animatronics... am I forgetting something?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.