Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

easyrowrdw

Well-Known Member
Where are you getting 74 million?

Even if true, I believe Thunderbolts three day global box office is significantly higher then Shang-Chi. It did come in lower then Quantumania, the third installment in a successful series - just like pretty much every other Marvel debut film,
Are the international markets the same? The opening of a movie in international markets can vary from one film to the next so I can see why domestic opening weekends makes for a more straightforward comparison.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Disney knows how to CUT COSTS and NOT overspend in its theme park business, especially WDW ;) If they do spend on the theme parks, they S T R E T C H the spending over MANY YEARS on the same project! ;)
You just described every business that uses modern accounting going back almost 100 years. Disney is no different in that regard, they just use generally accepted accounting practices (GAAP) for amortizing costs over time.

I really wish business and economics courses were still taught in schools.
 

Ghost93

Well-Known Member
I think it makes it worst by renaming it.
I think the New Avengers is a clever reveal in the movie itself, but I feel renaming the movie in the marketing after one week will just confuse people more than anything else. In fact, it might turn people against the movie as they will see a bunch of D-list characters and say "NOT MY AVENGERS!!"


Now to be fair, I think the movie does a terrific job of developing the characters and making you really like them. I was a bit indifferent the Black Widow movie and didn't care for The Falcon and the Winter Soldier (the two MCU properties Thunderbolts most directly follows up on with the inclusion of Yelena, Red Guardian, Valentina and John Walker). And Ghost left no impression on me in Ant-man and the Wasp. So I wasn't at all hyped to see these characters when this movie was announced, and I'm sure most people felt similarly.

Yet, by the time Thunderbolts ended, I had grown to love the characters as the movie did a fantastic job fleshing them out. So by the time the movie revealed these characters are the "New Avengers" (as the marketing is now spoiling), I was on board, and I am now looking forward to see what happens next with them. But the casual moviegoer who hasn't seen the movie yet will likely scoff at the idea of these guys becoming the next Avengers team, as they only know the characters from how they were depicted their less well received movies/TV shows.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
You missed the part were I said the first film in a franchise within the MCU….check out what the first Captain America, GoftG, Antman, and Thor did opening weekend…,

Oh, okay. I can plug those specific Marvel movie types (first outing of a successful franchise) into the machine and see what it says.

and are you sure your numbers are right??? 85% of Brave New World….. cap only made 10 million more

They aren't "my" numbers. They are the numbers from the website called, conveniently, The Numbers. I only put in which movies I want to compare, and the numbers are there from the usual public disclosure sources the industry uses to track box office. Which is probably why they call themselves The Numbers.

Here's how those Franchise Starters looked at their domestic opening weekends, adjusted for inflation...

Thunderbolts did 80% of Captain America 1
Thunderbolts
did 56% of Guardians of the Galaxy 1
Thunderbolts
did 79% of Thor 1
Thunderbolts
did 96% of Ant-Man 1

Honey, Why Don't We Start A Franchise.jpg


The closest analogy for Thunderbolts at this point is Ant-Man 1 in 2015. But Ant-Man performed much stronger overseas than Thunderbolts is currently doing. Almost double the domestic box office from overseas for Ant-Man! And Thunderbolts has already opened this past weekend in all overseas markets; there is no foreign country left to open in for Thunderbolts.

It would appear that Thunderbolts will struggle to reach $500 Million, much less than Ant-Man 1's inflation adjusted $696 Million global take, barring some crazy strong legs domestically and a notable surge in box office overseas in the next few weeks. '

 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Even if true, I believe Thunderbolts three day global box office is significantly higher then Shang-Chi. It did come in lower then Quantumania, the third installment in a successful series - just like pretty much every other Marvel debut film,

That does not look to be the case. Even unadjusted for inflation, Shang-Chi had a better opening weekend than Thunderbolts by just over $1 Million.

And adjusted for inflation (2021-2024 was brutal on the pocketbook!), Thunderbolts had a domestic opening weekend that was 88% of the domestic opening weekend for Shang-Chi.

Who The Hell Is Shang-Chi.jpg


 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
It’s already started but you just label whatever you don’t like to hear as “semantics.”

Semantics doesn’t mean everything that doesn’t denigrate Disney.
Nope…we got the “I don’t understand…” stuff creeping in again. It’s disingenuous and not productive. Do as I say…not as I do
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Where are you getting 74 million?

Even if true, I believe Thunderbolts three day global box office is significantly higher then Shang-Chi. It did come in lower then Quantumania, the third installment in a successful series - just like pretty much every other Marvel debut film,
It was adjusted down…and no one on earth is making the case that’s good but you.

But hey…the 36 hour back and forth snit - contrary to reality -was fun 👍🏻
 

Agent H

Well-Known Member
This board really does insist on existing in its own little bubble separated from reality and knowledge.

It’s so dumb it honestly makes me wonder if I’m wrong for generally agreeing with the negative consensus on the theme park side of this site.
This wasn’t on my bingo card for 2025.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Nope…we got the “I don’t understand…” stuff creeping in again. It’s disingenuous and not productive. Do as I say…not as I do
When posters say they “don’t understand” in response to one of your posts it’s usually because your post is some cryptic word salad.

Post a bit clearer and posters would say they “don’t understand” a bit less.
 

TP2000

Well-Known Member
Also just so we're clear for the record so far for 2025 Disney has had one bomb, one so so film, and one still in theaters looking like it may do ok. This is all before Thunderbolts releases today.

I'm going to guess that the Bomb is Snow White, the So-So is Captain America 4, and the May Do OK is The Amateur?

Plus Thunderbolts. Which underwhelmed in its opening weekend against its $180 Million production budget.

Now that the first weekend in May is in globally, let's see how that looks at the box office...

Captain America 4: Production $180, Marketing $90, Domestic $120, Overseas $86 = $64 Million Loss
Snow White:
Production $269, Marketing $100, Domestic $52, Overseas $46 = $271 Million Loss
The Amateur:
Production $60, Marketing $30, Domestic $22, Overseas $20 = $48 Million Loss
Thunderbolts:
Production $180, Marketing $90, Domestic $44, Overseas $34 = ???? (Check back in June)

2025 Total Thus Far Without Thunderbolts = $383 Million Loss

How many days until Stitch arrives in theaters again?!? Some Burbank execs need to track those remaining days so they know how many refills to get on their Xanax prescription until then. :oops:

2025, Year Of The Snake.jpg



 
Last edited:

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I'm going to guess that the Bomb is Snow White, the So-So is Captain America 4, and the May Do OK is The Amateur?
Correct

Plus Thunderbolts. Which underwhelmed in its opening weekend against its $180 Million production budget.
That is still the unknown right now, we can check back in a couple weeks and see where its at.

Now that the first weekend in May is in globally, let's see how that looks at the box office...

Captain America 4: Production $180, Marketing $90, Domestic $120, Overseas $86 = $64 Million Loss
Snow White:
Production $269, Marketing $100, Domestic $52, Overseas $46 = $271 Million Loss
The Amateur:
Production $60, Marketing $30, Domestic $22, Overseas $20 = $48 Million Loss
Thunderbolts:
Production $180, Marketing $90, Domestic $44, Overseas $34 = ???? (Check back in June)

2025 Total Thus Far Without Thunderbolts = $383 Million Loss

How many days until Stitch arrives in theaters again?!? Some Burbank execs need to track those remaining days so they know how many refills to get on their Xanax prescription until then. :oops:

View attachment 857284


You're still over inflating the totals there because you still haven't halved the marketing as has been told to you before.

Using half the marketing but still using your splits -

Cap4 is ~$14M loss which is in the realm of breakeven/profitability depending on exact figures for theatrical. For sure will be profitable in post-theatrical.

Amateur is ~$33M loss and still bringing in money so chipping away at that, possible to hit breakeven/profitability by the end of its run, again depending on exact figures. And will most likely be profitable post-theatrical.

Snow White is ~$238M loss, and this I believe will be the one for sure black eye on 2025.

So that would be a ~$285M loss (if you take these at face value) which is $100M less than what you calculated due to your over inflating the marketing. As most here expect that Stitch will wipe away any losses this is won't likely even be a footnote by the end of the year.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom