Sirwalterraleigh
Premium Member
It’s a pattern…you can plot the downward trajectory on a chartYou’re saying this like it’s an absolute 100 percent fact which it is not.
It’s a pattern…you can plot the downward trajectory on a chartYou’re saying this like it’s an absolute 100 percent fact which it is not.
Its too bad Disney's movie business does not understand this concept.Maximize Return On Capital Employed
That is why I went with Us as opposed to Get Out….. both were original horror…..but Us came out after Peele had establish himself with Get Out…. Just as Coogler is already an establish director with the likes of Black Panther and CreedWould $48 million have been considered bad for an original R-rated horror movie?
Get Out had a $33 million opening. Us was an all-time high that benefited from Peele's established reputation after
Adding to this Hercules treasure planet and encanto all underperformed and I wouldn’t say those are bad movies either.It’s an especially odd statement from a Disney fan. Unless he considers Fantasia, Alice in Wonderland, and Sleeping Beauty bad movies.
You're right, there have always been bad movies, just the excuses for failure have changedThis has never ever ever been true.
Deadpool did cross my mind… but as you said it was not the MCU… so I did not count it…. For some reason Black Panther slipped my mind as I typed right before bed…. But that movie had circumstances that were outside the MCU brandBlack Panther also, technically Deadpool too but that was Fox at the time and not part of the MCU, but for the most part I agree that Thunderbolts is in the same ballpark as other debut stories.
May I ask for clarification? (Publicly only so that the group are all on the same page.)I understand that it is difficult, if not impossible, to discuss box office numbers without getting political - I appreciate and thank those who have managed to do it - but the no politics rule still applies.
That should solve the “political” talk issue.![]()
White House Says “No Final Decisions” Have Been Made on Movie Tariffs, Still “Exploring All Options”
The administration says it is still intent on "Making Hollywood Great Again" though it suggests it will take time for tariff plan to come to fruition.www.yahoo.com
Not surprising but the tariffs on foreign made movies may actually not be happening,
That is why I went with Us as opposed to Get Out….. both were original horror…..but Us came out after Peele had establish himself with Get Out…. Just as Coogler is already an establish director with the likes of Black Panther and Creed
Of course it is, which is why the poster shouldn't have presented it as an absolute or if they didn't mean it as one, at least include some language to indicate that. Not being more precise with words is one of the big issues we have with folks talking past each other.Yeah…but you know it’s disingenuous to claim absolutes
See, I am not sure I completely agree with this either. I think movies don't do well for a lot of reasons and being bad might be a plurality, but I don't think it is a majority if we are looking at main stream releases.Obviously there are outliers…but the point is valid: most movies tank because they suck…in the wash. It’s patterns that matter…not individualized case studies
They haven't had the consistency they used to in recent years, but they have put out good movies, some of which didn't do well in the box office.That’s what’s been going on for the Dis…just really bad story and character choices…
I am sure that is one factor.The added wrinkle is that the collector movie market has started to possible reject things due to saturation?
Like it or not, we will get more of both.It certainly seems possible. We might be getting “no mas”on MCU and live action remakes. So they are gonna have to address that…
If good originals keep failing to break through then yes, no matter who is in the C-Suite we are looking at studios leaning more into sequels and remakes/reboots across the board.…more frozen…I’m sure.![]()
We’re going to reference reality and draw lessons from history rather than just shouting emotionally satisfying nonsense. There’s too much of the latter going on in general.So we’re gonna do the word games/semantics with absolutes, eh?
I haven't read the WSJ article, but I think it was fairly well discussed in other threads how Feige was being spread thin and that it affected production and quality of the MCU movies in Phases 4/5. And that in 2023 (I think that was when) he took back the reigns so to speak as they refocused.By the way, a lot of posters reacted with incredulity when I pointed out that a LOT of Marvels recent troubles were due to Feige stepping back. I believe the Wall Street Journal has a big article explaining precisely that.
I just read that it came in under projections.It beat projections.
It is an interesting theory and assuming that 2023 date is accurate we have a nice dividing line to track it.I haven't read the WSJ article, but I think it was fairly well discussed in other threads how Feige was being spread thin and that it affected production and quality of the MCU movies in Phases 4/5. And that in 2023 (I think that was when) he took back the reigns so to speak as they refocused.
I believe Thunderbolts is one of the first ones produced after he took back the reigns, and the higher quality of the movie shows that.
Where are you getting 74 million?Thunderbolts actually opened with $74M domestically which puts it under Ant-Man/Wasp and Shang-Chi and ahead of Eternals for OW domestic tallies
So it seemsIts too bad Disney's movie business does not understand this concept.![]()
That one is well out of control now tooDisney's theme park business for sure understands this concept.![]()
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.