Tony the Tigger
Well-Known Member
If I understand you correctly, you’re saying that the logical conclusion a typical viewer would reach when watching The Lion King is that Mufasa and Scar aren’t brothers by blood. If that is indeed what you’re saying, I disagree completely, but I’m not sure there’s much to be gained by continuing this.
That’s not what I said at all.
I said the logical assumption as a viewer would be that they are brothers. However, it is still just that: an assumption.
An extreme example of that would be the movie the sixth sense. It is logical to assume throughout the movie that Bruce Willis is alive. That doesn’t mean it is correct. It is a device used to trick the viewer to believe something for a time, or for a whole film.
Now, do I think that’s what was at play here? No, but it’s a credible idea.
I think what was at play here was that the original filmmaker had an idea that wasn’t used, but also wasn’t specifically excluded by the finished product. It is not uncommon at all to revisit such things in future remakes, prequels, or sequels. I see this much like the way fans of Walt Disney would like to use his old ideas that were scrapped for what was deemed a better route at the time.
I’m sure we could find things between wicked and the Wizard of Oz that don’t quite line up perfectly.
I don’t think any of this is very important.