Prince-1
Well-Known Member
Luckily…we talk about the moves of a publicly traded international entertainment conglomerate here…not a major medical occurrence
We did when Covid was all the rage. Everyone was an infectious disease expert.
Luckily…we talk about the moves of a publicly traded international entertainment conglomerate here…not a major medical occurrence
…of course we wereWe did when Covid was all the rage. Everyone was an infectious disease expert.
Testy exchange between CNBC host Becky Quick who feels Disney is becoming anti-consumer with the lightning lanes and such and media analyst Rich Greenfield who loves it when companies raise prices and rips people off.
My kids think it's a "luxury" product lol. If we didn't pay for it they would be stuck with Six Flags and they much prefer WDW.Pretty much confirmation they’re lost
It’s not a “luxury” product…which is why it worked for 100 years
Testy exchange between CNBC host Becky Quick who feels Disney is becoming anti-consumer with the lightning lanes and such and media analyst Rich Greenfield who loves it when companies raise prices and rips people off.
That’s an opinionMy kids think it's a "luxury" product lol. If we didn't pay for it they would be stuck with Six Flags and they much prefer WDW.
No, it's just that there are different definitions and connotations to "luxury." It can mean "something desired and often expensive but not necessary" according to Merriam-Webster. Disney seems to fit that.I love her…absolutely nails it
That’s an opinion
That is 100% incorrect based on their history, strategy, customer response, stability and resiliency
Is this the “I think it’s this…” again?
Disney may be counting on the wealthy people who think designer handbags are stupid but won’t blink at buying a $15 sandwich.Here's another recent WSJ article about consumer spending, and the current dynamic which Disney is certainly caught up in.
"The top 10% of earners—households making about $250,000 a year or more—are splurging on everything from vacations to designer handbags, buoyed by big gains in stocks, real estate and other assets.
Those consumers now account for 49.7% of all spending, a record in data going back to 1989, according to an analysis by Moody’s Analytics. Three decades ago, they accounted for about 36%.
All this means that economic growth is unusually reliant on rich Americans continuing to shell out. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, estimated that spending by the top 10% alone accounted for almost one-third of gross domestic product.
Between September 2023 and September 2024, the high earners increased their spending by 12%. Spending by working-class and middle-class households, meanwhile, dropped over the same period."
This reinforces the same question I and others have had for a long time regarding Disney. If everyone is in competition for the dollars and time from the wealthiest, how can Disney deliver a worsening product and expect to be a winner?
"Pierce, who lives in Marin County, Calif., has been scaling back on takeout meals because of rising prices: “I don’t want to have a $15 sandwich.”
Pierce and her husband together bring in about $300,000 a year, largely from investment income. The couple and their teenage son went on a three-week safari to Africa in July that cost about $35,000. "
This re-emphasizes a point, that sometimes gets lost. This person can certainly afford a $15 sandwich, but recognizes that it's stupid to spend money this way. Value still matters, even to wealthy folks.
Sure but sometimes that 15 dollar sandwich is too good to not buy it.Here's another recent WSJ article about consumer spending, and the current dynamic which Disney is certainly caught up in.
"The top 10% of earners—households making about $250,000 a year or more—are splurging on everything from vacations to designer handbags, buoyed by big gains in stocks, real estate and other assets.
Those consumers now account for 49.7% of all spending, a record in data going back to 1989, according to an analysis by Moody’s Analytics. Three decades ago, they accounted for about 36%.
All this means that economic growth is unusually reliant on rich Americans continuing to shell out. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, estimated that spending by the top 10% alone accounted for almost one-third of gross domestic product.
Between September 2023 and September 2024, the high earners increased their spending by 12%. Spending by working-class and middle-class households, meanwhile, dropped over the same period."
This reinforces the same question I and others have had for a long time regarding Disney. If everyone is in competition for the dollars and time from the wealthiest, how can Disney deliver a worsening product and expect to be a winner?
"Pierce, who lives in Marin County, Calif., has been scaling back on takeout meals because of rising prices: “I don’t want to have a $15 sandwich.”
Pierce and her husband together bring in about $300,000 a year, largely from investment income. The couple and their teenage son went on a three-week safari to Africa in July that cost about $35,000. "
This re-emphasizes a point, that sometimes gets lost. This person can certainly afford a $15 sandwich, but recognizes that it's stupid to spend money this way. Value still matters, even to wealthy folks.
Testy exchange between CNBC host Becky Quick who feels Disney is becoming anti-consumer with the lightning lanes and such and media analyst Rich Greenfield who loves it when companies raise prices and rips people off.
This reinforces the same question I and others have had for a long time regarding Disney. If everyone is in competition for the dollars and time from the wealthiest, how can Disney deliver a worsening product and expect to be a winner?
Huh? YOY growth domestically has gone flat. Take out LL revenues and it gets bad.How long has this been a question? The parks are still busy and raking in cash.
But Disney isn't even doing that. They are cutting and raising prices. It's the reason why less people are going and why they're in this problem to begin with.Cutting back on services and amenities might be the only way to keep them even close to being affordable now.
What? Low income guests are gone. Middle Income guests, the kind that built the Disney brand are leaving and not coming back. It's been mentioned multiple times here that guest retention efforts are not working and potential guests are being going to destinations which offer a better value proposition.If people on the lower income side actually did stop visiting, they could reintroduce amenities and luxuries for the higher paying guests.
Except they've been doing that since the summer of 2023. They've tried every discount trick from Free Dining to 40%AP discounts and it isn't working.Or pivot back to discounting.
IDK, 2025-2028 are going to be rough.They will be fine.
How long has this been a question? The parks are still busy and raking in cash.
Cutting back on services and amenities might be the only way to keep them even close to being affordable now. If people on the lower income side actually did stop visiting, they could reintroduce amenities and luxuries for the higher paying guests. Or pivot back to discounting.
They will be fine.
Yep. I've been saying the same thing all along.Here's another recent WSJ article about consumer spending, and the current dynamic which Disney is certainly caught up in.
"The top 10% of earners—households making about $250,000 a year or more—are splurging on everything from vacations to designer handbags, buoyed by big gains in stocks, real estate and other assets.
Those consumers now account for 49.7% of all spending, a record in data going back to 1989, according to an analysis by Moody’s Analytics. Three decades ago, they accounted for about 36%.
All this means that economic growth is unusually reliant on rich Americans continuing to shell out. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, estimated that spending by the top 10% alone accounted for almost one-third of gross domestic product.
Between September 2023 and September 2024, the high earners increased their spending by 12%. Spending by working-class and middle-class households, meanwhile, dropped over the same period."
This reinforces the same question I and others have had for a long time regarding Disney. If everyone is in competition for the dollars and time from the wealthiest, how can Disney deliver a worsening product and expect to be a winner?
"Pierce, who lives in Marin County, Calif., has been scaling back on takeout meals because of rising prices: “I don’t want to have a $15 sandwich.”
Pierce and her husband together bring in about $300,000 a year, largely from investment income. The couple and their teenage son went on a three-week safari to Africa in July that cost about $35,000. "
This re-emphasizes a point, that sometimes gets lost. This person can certainly afford a $15 sandwich, but recognizes that it's stupid to spend money this way. Value still matters, even to wealthy folks.
If you know anything about why Disney parks work…and I’m beginning to have my doubts that a lot of fans do…this is unsustainable.Here's another recent WSJ article about consumer spending, and the current dynamic which Disney is certainly caught up in.
"The top 10% of earners—households making about $250,000 a year or more—are splurging on everything from vacations to designer handbags, buoyed by big gains in stocks, real estate and other assets.
Those consumers now account for 49.7% of all spending, a record in data going back to 1989, according to an analysis by Moody’s Analytics. Three decades ago, they accounted for about 36%.
All this means that economic growth is unusually reliant on rich Americans continuing to shell out. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, estimated that spending by the top 10% alone accounted for almost one-third of gross domestic product.
Between September 2023 and September 2024, the high earners increased their spending by 12%. Spending by working-class and middle-class households, meanwhile, dropped over the same period."
This reinforces the same question I and others have had for a long time regarding Disney. If everyone is in competition for the dollars and time from the wealthiest, how can Disney deliver a worsening product and expect to be a winner?
"Pierce, who lives in Marin County, Calif., has been scaling back on takeout meals because of rising prices: “I don’t want to have a $15 sandwich.”
Pierce and her husband together bring in about $300,000 a year, largely from investment income. The couple and their teenage son went on a three-week safari to Africa in July that cost about $35,000. "
This re-emphasizes a point, that sometimes gets lost. This person can certainly afford a $15 sandwich, but recognizes that it's stupid to spend money this way. Value still matters, even to wealthy folks.
Here's another recent WSJ article about consumer spending, and the current dynamic which Disney is certainly caught up in.
"The top 10% of earners—households making about $250,000 a year or more—are splurging on everything from vacations to designer handbags, buoyed by big gains in stocks, real estate and other assets.
Those consumers now account for 49.7% of all spending, a record in data going back to 1989, according to an analysis by Moody’s Analytics. Three decades ago, they accounted for about 36%.
All this means that economic growth is unusually reliant on rich Americans continuing to shell out. Mark Zandi, chief economist at Moody’s Analytics, estimated that spending by the top 10% alone accounted for almost one-third of gross domestic product.
Between September 2023 and September 2024, the high earners increased their spending by 12%. Spending by working-class and middle-class households, meanwhile, dropped over the same period."
This reinforces the same question I and others have had for a long time regarding Disney. If everyone is in competition for the dollars and time from the wealthiest, how can Disney deliver a worsening product and expect to be a winner?
"Pierce, who lives in Marin County, Calif., has been scaling back on takeout meals because of rising prices: “I don’t want to have a $15 sandwich.”
Pierce and her husband together bring in about $300,000 a year, largely from investment income. The couple and their teenage son went on a three-week safari to Africa in July that cost about $35,000. "
This re-emphasizes a point, that sometimes gets lost. This person can certainly afford a $15 sandwich, but recognizes that it's stupid to spend money this way. Value still matters, even to wealthy folks.
Is that why attendance has been up the last couple of years…when more frivolous cash has been spent by the first world than in most of its history combined?Really interesting article. My guess is that anywhere below the 500k mark, it depends a great deal on cost of living and life circumstances. I also see a lot of articles about people making 250k a year and living paycheck to paycheck these days.
A noteworthy point, I think - in 1980, there were about 226 million people in the US. The top 10% was between 22 and 23 million people (ballpark, not sure if these numbers account for the entire household or just the earners). Today there are 340 million people, meaning the top 10% has presumably added about 12 million people. I assume international travel is also much more prevalent. I think that probably impacts how much Disney has been able to raise prices. There are signs we may be headed for a population decline in the next couple of generations but up to now the growing audience pool has made the parks a more and more limited resource, relatively speaking.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.