Loose Pebble
Active Member
But Turning Red has a panda so it’s animal themed. So it’s a perfect fit.Turning Red in DAK would be far, far worse than even a Zootopia land there.
But Turning Red has a panda so it’s animal themed. So it’s a perfect fit.Turning Red in DAK would be far, far worse than even a Zootopia land there.
Yes, and Raya, and Turning Red as well.
I thought that post was being sarcastic as Mulan wouldn’t fit at allWhere would Mulan fit in Anandapur?
You just explained the parking lotSo today I went to the Columbus zoo and they had a dinosaur boat ride (part of their temporary dinosaur exhibit) with hundreds of dinosaur animatronics. It was all themed pretty well (partially due to it taking place in the area of the zoo that already had natural jungle foliage).
It made ponder upon the dinosaur land at animal kingdom and made me realize that they honestly never did enough with it.
Obviously the dark ride is great, but they truly should have added some accompanying rides to go with it.
I think if they actually had a budget for dinosaur land it would still be here today…and mine you, I think it’s a concept that should come back at some point.
But they never did the land the true justice it deserved.
The thing Disney realized is they won't ever beat the IP. They would always be playing "second fiddle" in peoples mind compared to Jurassic Park because Disney has the "generic dinosaur land" vs the empire that is Jurassic Park. River Adventure is in a terrible state right now in my opinion but Velocicoaster is one of the top coasters in Florida so JP has a huge range of meh to great.It's sad that they never added the Excavator coaster. They seemed to just give up against Universal IOA's Jurassic Park land. Ironically that land needs more TLC as well. I definitely think if Disney had invested in the land more, they could have beaten Jurassic Park land in quality.
Disney twice failed to make a popular dinosaur movie (and Fox didn't do much better). While Universal ran away with that genre.It's sad that they never added the Excavator coaster. They seemed to just give up against Universal IOA's Jurassic Park land. Ironically that land needs more TLC as well. I definitely think if Disney had invested in the land more, they could have beaten Jurassic Park land in quality.
Well there was a world where we instead got a half-baked Beastly Kingdom so... atleast we kinda got the good ending with Beastly Kingdom inspo seemingly going elsewhere. In a different world, Disney would have figured out the Dino thing and we could have gotten a killer dinosaur land. This reality isn't too bad imo. Dinosaurs should still have some representation in Animal Kingdom but maybe a whole land wasn't ever really going to work out.I agree with you both that it doesn’t make business sense and we weren’t getting non-IP stuff. I just wish that we could have seen what WDI could have done with dinosaurs without massive budget cuts forcing them to do a parking lot fair.
The WDI of a decade ago is not the same as it is today.We had similar fears about Avatar being a war movie and the land fits seamlessly into the park. The story treatments they've publicly stated give me quite a bit of confidence in this land.
The WDI of a decade ago is not the same as it is today.
The WDI of a decade ago is not the same as it is today.
Exactly. It screams missed potential. Dinosaurs are an ever popular theme, not to mention melding well into AK. If Dinoland were simply plussed rather than eliminated, it would be great.So today I went to the Columbus zoo and they had a dinosaur boat ride (part of their temporary dinosaur exhibit) with hundreds of dinosaur animatronics. It was all themed pretty well (partially due to it taking place in the area of the zoo that already had natural jungle foliage).
It made ponder upon the dinosaur land at animal kingdom and made me realize that they honestly never did enough with it.
Obviously the dark ride is great, but they truly should have added some accompanying rides to go with it.
I think if they actually had a budget for dinosaur land it would still be here today…and mine you, I think it’s a concept that should come back at some point.
But they never did the land the true justice it deserved.
I'm concerned about the Encanto house, not going to lie. I just struggle to see how it will really fit into the park. But, people say the same thing about the existing carnival games, so I guess you can't please everyone.I don’t think this one will be hard to get right. The land itself fits in with other lands of AK and it is really only the IPs from the rides that don’t. But I think that’ll be hidden mostly by the facade with Indy. With Encanto it might be a little less so.
I would have been in your same boat, but IMO there’s no denying that WDI has had a mixed bag of successes and failures lately.Are you saying they are less creative and able? I will have to disagree with you on that.
They're clearly just doing this because they don't have any popular dinosaur-related IPs. Of course, the most recent Indiana Jones movie flopped, so I don't see why The Good Dinosaur's underperforming should prevent them from doing anything with THAT.Dinosaurs are an ever popular theme, not to mention melding well into AK. If Dinoland were simply plussed rather than eliminated, it would be great.
I'd argue that the Ratatouille ride and Mickey's Slow-Moving Railway suck too. Oh, and who can forget the Beauty and the Beast sing-along and its weird "Lefou was orchestrating everything" subplot?Recent WDI failures:
• reliability issues with TBA, ROTR, and the EPCOT hub lighting package (to me these are undeniable)
• TBA and Cosmic Rewind storylines (I’ll admit this one is a bit subjective and perhaps could be blamed on executives and creatives outside of WDI)
• poor use of space and shade in Toy Story Land
Oh I don’t think either suck. I’ve only ridden each of them once but I liked Ratatouille better than Cosmic Rewind!I'd argue that the Ratatouille ride and Mickey's Slow-Moving Railway suck too.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.