• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Lightning Lane at Walt Disney World

Dranth

Well-Known Member
Dude....as long as you know/knew to book at 7am (and now would be pre book ur first ride only eliminating 7am) and then book 2 hours later (from the pool, from the golf course, from ur bed, from the park, from ANYWHERE) then Gennie+ was 1,000x better


thats not too hard to get
What you are failing to acknowledge is that most people are happier with a "worse" system as they don't care about potential use, only what fits their needs best. Throw in that G+ got to eat all the hate from being the first paid system and here we are.

Mathematically, the new system is the same for power users that rope drop and worse for everyone else and we have years of Thrill Data historical sell out times to prove it. That could easily change as Disney irons out kinks in the new system and makes adjustments but for some groups yes, it will always be worse.

All that aside, if having three preselects is more valuable because it prevents concern or anxiety then it doesn't matter that you may have been able to get more with a different system (quality and quantity wise). Peace of mind is what is being sold with this new system, not that it is better for getting more short lines.
 

TheMaxRebo

Well-Known Member
Peace of mind is what is being sold with this new system, not that it is better for getting more short lines.

I think that is what has been pitched for all of the systems Disney has had. They hav never been about skipping "all" lines, it's not an Express Pass, it is about letting users pick a few longer lines to skip but standby would still be bulk of what they use.

Power users have been able to leverage the systems to get more out of it (and I would say G+ enabled this over use the most) but they are the exception to the rules of what Disney is aiming for. And letting people have 3 set ahead of time better enables this "peace of mind" for majority of users
 

JIMMYEDDIE

Active Member
What you are failing to acknowledge is that most people are happier with a "worse" system as they don't care about potential use, only what fits their needs best. Throw in that G+ got to eat all the hate from being the first paid system and here we are.

Mathematically, the new system is the same for power users that rope drop and worse for everyone else and we have years of Thrill Data historical sell out times to prove it. That could easily change as Disney irons out kinks in the new system and makes adjustments but for some groups yes, it will always be worse.

All that aside, if having three preselects is more valuable because it prevents concern or anxiety then it doesn't matter that you may have been able to get more with a different system (quality and quantity wise). Peace of mind is what is being sold with this new system, not that it is better for getting more short lines.
Well paying for an inferior product makes no sense to me and i truely believe that once people use this they will agree

i am willing to put $ on it that this gets changed before November
 

JIMMYEDDIE

Active Member
What you are failing to acknowledge is that most people are happier with a "worse" system as they don't care about potential use, only what fits their needs best. Throw in that G+ got to eat all the hate from being the first paid system and here we are.

Mathematically, the new system is the same for power users that rope drop and worse for everyone else and we have years of Thrill Data historical sell out times to prove it. That could easily change as Disney irons out kinks in the new system and makes adjustments but for some groups yes, it will always be worse.

All that aside, if having three preselects is more valuable because it prevents concern or anxiety then it doesn't matter that you may have been able to get more with a different system (quality and quantity wise). Peace of mind is what is being sold with this new system, not that it is better for getting more short lines.
So toss out all common sense for a false sense of comfort? im not buying it
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I think that is what has been pitched for all of the systems Disney has had. They hav never been about skipping "all" lines, it's not an Express Pass, it is about letting users pick a few longer lines to skip but standby would still be bulk of what they use.

Power users have been able to leverage the systems to get more out of it (and I would say G+ enabled this over use the most) but they are the exception to the rules of what Disney is aiming for. And letting people have 3 set ahead of time better enables this "peace of mind" for majority of users
None of these systems have ever been about “maximizing use”

It’s a silly idea to even float.

It was always about reducing time in queues so you’re in a better mood and SPEND more.

That used to be of mutual benefit…much less so as time goes on
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Well paying for an inferior product makes no sense to me and i truely believe that once people use this they will agree

i am willing to put $ on it that this gets changed before November
No way in hell…

And you’re supposed to pay for $500 lunches and merch…not cost account your ride pass each day. They staff and open the parks in the morning for the former…not the latter
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
Again you are not comparing apples to apples here. LLMP availability at 4pm is for people who already have 2 better LLs booked between 4pm and park close, this is picking up a 3rd one.
Just want to point out that this isn't entirely true either. Anyone who couldn't schedule before 4pm because good times were gone or don't show up until later could very well be stuck with worse options they can't change to what they want due to restrictions like the tiers.

That didn't happen under G+ which is one reason I don't like the new one as much.

They’ll miss out like they did with Genie+. Rides with drops like Tiana, Slinky, and Remy were absolutely not available easily with Genie either. I’m not buying into the revisionist history of Genie+. No line skip system has been kind to the guest who has not learned how to manipulate it.
Small push back on some of this. Most days you could still get SDD, it just may have a late time.

Just for a quick example, looking at the last Wednesday of July 2023 vs. 2024, SDD lasted until 11:29AM last year. Today it was gone at 8:02 AM. That means under G+ you could still get it for your second pick 2 hours after park opened even if you hadn't been to the park yet vs. new system where it was gone before the park even opened.

I know we don't have a lot of data on the new one yet and I am sure Disney is tweaking things but so far, that discrepancy has been pretty consistent for most of the T1 rides. The T2 ones are far worse because now you have to pick some up front vs. before were only people who wanted them grabbed them, when they wanted them.

Remy was more of a choice. It was easy to get, you just weren't going to get it and FEA if you waited till 2 hours post open on most days. If you went early you could get both no problem outside of the busiest days.

Finally, Tiana didn't exist under G+ but Splash never really ran out in my experience though I do tend to go in the cooler months so maybe it did during the summer.
 
Last edited:

Splash4eva

Well-Known Member
I think that is what has been pitched for all of the systems Disney has had. They hav never been about skipping "all" lines, it's not an Express Pass, it is about letting users pick a few longer lines to skip but standby would still be bulk of what they use.

Power users have been able to leverage the systems to get more out of it (and I would say G+ enabled this over use the most) but they are the exception to the rules of what Disney is aiming for. And letting people have 3 set ahead of time better enables this "peace of mind" for majority of users
I want to compare this logic and reasoning to those who would say i wanna buy the dining plan even if its more expensive so i dont have to worry when i go on vacation. People would rather 3 lesser rides and a worse system than what we had…. Dammmm Disney must love these customers they have lining up
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
to try and sell hotel rooms but it will 100% backfire because it actually PENALIZES resort guests who dont rope drop, which is 90% of resort guests.......

you will see...this wont last 3 months
Disney does not problem with simply changing rules at a drop of a hat.

The will be tweaking this over and over and the guest experience will suffer not only by changes that do not help but just the changes that happen on the fly that confuses folks.
 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
I want to compare this logic and reasoning to those who would say i wanna buy the dining plan even if its more expensive so i dont have to worry when i go on vacation. People would rather 3 lesser rides and a worse system than what we had…. Dammmm Disney must love these customers they have lining up
Probably the most cogent take here today
 
Last edited:

DisneyHead123

Well-Known Member
I want to compare this logic and reasoning to those who would say i wanna buy the dining plan even if its more expensive so i dont have to worry when i go on vacation. People would rather 3 lesser rides and a worse system than what we had…. Dammmm Disney must love these customers they have lining up
The dining plan I didn't quite understand, unless you wanted to gift it to someone.

This, however, does make more sense for large groups who need very specific rides at very specific times. The odds of getting the exact ride you wanted at the exact time you wanted, during peak park hours, were pretty slim with the old system.
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
Well paying for an inferior product makes no sense to me and i truely believe that once people use this they will agree

i am willing to put $ on it that this gets changed before November
I agree, it is worse. It is the worst system they have ever had for the way I like to vacation, but it is what they are offering currently. All of us can either make the best of it and use it, go and don't use it, or not go at all. Personally, I will go and try it and if it is great, wonderful, if not I will be politely letting them know how much worse it is and I hope everyone else who feels the same does as well. That is how things change.

As for changes, I doubt they will make too many outward changes by November as I am sure they want a good chunk of data to pore over before doing anything on that front. I do think we will see them play with overall capacity, when it is released, how much is reserved for day of, etc. Mainly backend updates.
 

JIMMYEDDIE

Active Member
Disney does not problem with simply changing rules at a drop of a hat.

The will be tweaking this over and over and the guest experience will suffer not only by changes that do not help but just the changes that happen on the fly that confuses folks.
My point exactly.

Why they did this version knowing that FP+ tiering was universally hated and now throw in it costs money and there are fewer rides to choose from and they thought this would work?

How do they keep getting it wrong.

Genie + only lasted 2 1/2 years.

MDE was over $1b project and was scraped well before its intended life cycle.

This is the worst of them all.

Disney,
Please hire more informed people and get this right for once and for all.
 

Disstevefan1

Well-Known Member
In my opinion its all about MONEY.

Disney doesn't care about the guest experience, they will tweak the system such that they can get the most people to purchase it.

My hope a side effect of the changes they they may improve the guest experience, but we must realize, the guest experience is NOT the priority for Disney.

The priority for Disney is MONEY when it comes to their them parks.
 

JIMMYEDDIE

Active Member
I agree, it is worse. It is the worst system they have ever had for the way I like to vacation, but it is what they are offering currently. All of us can either make the best of it and use it, go and don't use it or not go at all. Personally, I will go and try it and if it is great, wonderful, if not I will be politely letting them know how much worse it is and I hope everyone else who feels the same does as well. That is how things change.

As for changes, I doubt they will make too many outward changes by November as I am sure they want a good chunk of data to pore over before doing anything on that front. I do think we will see them play with overall capacity, when it is released, how much is reserved for day of, etc. Mainly backend updates.
Let's see what resort bookings are. This is not helping and i think it's actually hurting.
 

JIMMYEDDIE

Active Member
In my opinion its all about MONEY.

Disney doesn't care about the guest experience, they will tweak the system such that they can get the most people to purchase it.

My hope a side effect of the changes they they may improve the guest experience, but we must realize, the guest experience is NOT the priority for Disney.

The priority for Disney is MONEY when it comes to their them parks.
Agree. But high guest satisfaction = more
Money.
 

Dranth

Well-Known Member
Let's see what resort bookings are. This is not helping and u think it's actually hurting.
I think it is a worse system to get more/better short lines vs. G+. My point is that more/better selections are not as important as other factors for many guests.

On the booking front, I expect it will help because paying for an overpriced room with more benefits is better than paying for the same overpriced room with less benefits. I don't think it will move the needle much, but it will help a little.
 

JIMMYEDDIE

Active Member
It's not that I loved it
I can definitely see that you loved this system and I'm sorry it changed on you.

That said, the way you describe it, it basically sounds like Universal's Express Pass, except for $30. There's just no way.

I think if you have a lot of factors in your favor, it probably worked pretty well for some people. Those being:

- Traveling solo or in a small group

- Visiting the parks during off seasons and off hours

- Able to wait around for drops or refresh, on the chance something comes up

- Almost total flexibility in what you ride next, i.e., a headliner opens, you go for it

Contrast that to the experience of many families, who are:

- Traveling in large multigenerational groups

- Visit during peak travel times

- Can only visit the parks for a few hours a day

- Are on a set schedule and can't wait around with the hope that something might open up

- Have very specific rides that they promise their children based on favorite movies, favorite rides, it's Little Billy's turn to pick because his sister picked the last ride, etc.

For us Genie+ was basically worth 2 rides, 3 at most, with the third usually being a throw-away that was a 20 minute wait even during peak spring break seas

It's not that I loved it (but yes I did love it).

It's that they changed to a vastly inferior system that hurts pretty much all of their guests.
 

Saskdw

Well-Known Member
I want to compare this logic and reasoning to those who would say i wanna buy the dining plan even if its more expensive so i dont have to worry when i go on vacation. People would rather 3 lesser rides and a worse system than what we had…. Dammmm Disney must love these customers they have lining up
Never paid for the dining plan. Did like "Free Dining" though, When it was the full dining plan not the QS chicken finger plan.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom