SourcererMark79
Well-Known Member
- In the Parks
- No
Hmmm not very magical either.Right!? Not very welcoming is it.
Hmmm not very magical either.Right!? Not very welcoming is it.
Do you think they'll drop a sample of the song prior to the opening? "Leak" or blog post. Seems like it'd be a good way to hype it up.You guys are going to have to take my word for this one because it's impossible to get audio of, but PJ's song is playing in the finale again. It sounds very quick-paced and upbeat, perfect for a party scene. I hear a tambourine and trumpet playing, but can't hear any lyrics from the bridge out front. So close, yet so far.
It’s a princess ride. The ride is named after an official Disney princess.I don’t understand the bolded.
And I’m not sure we can really call this a princess ride when the only royal reference we know of is the tiara. Nothing else that’s been revealed about the ride suggests an overly young or “girly” experience, or one more aimed at children than Splash was.
the water tower bothers me that way as wellRight!? Not very welcoming is it. Feels corporate.
Some folksy 1920s slang probably wouldn't have hurt. Shame they're insistent on wording us to death.
And they'll be sprinkling many references in the attraction to reinforce that "princess" branding as well. Be it directly referenced in character dialogue, a banner saying "Princess Tiana", the iconic dress finale... and there's possibly even a tiara-centric subplot that's yet to be revealed.It’s a princess ride. The ride is named after an official Disney princess.
Umm, actually- Disney was done and fine with the bright yellow because they're stoopid and don't know how imagineer anymur. Its only because real Disney fans complained that Iger gave bigger budget and brought in Universel artists to fix. I'm hearing budgit for ride now over 800 million. If you don't believe me, I'll send youtube link with googly eye thumbnail.The yellow of the building has been toned down with faux weathering so it isn't neon-yellow any more. A nice improvement.
Funny how waiting until things are done before giving one's verdict makes one look less... extremist.
The old exterior was only scary is how much of a mutilated and garish twin it was to it's charming predecessor in California. I'd also say that widening the flume (great idea for capacity) made the drop look much shorter by comparison. Anyway, while my dream was that the rock-work be completely re-worked, this solution by over-growth is still far better looking that what we had before.I really don’t think the old exterior looked as scary as some here maintain. The briar patch was distinctly cartoony and not, in my view, menacing. The most frightening thing was the drop itself, which still remains visible.
Not in the sense that people mean here, i.e., something that will primarily appeal to little girls. It’s designed to have the same broad appeal as any other family attraction at Disney.It’s a princess ride.
Setting aside whether this existing ride lends itself to a “Princess” attraction, many of the critiques (mine included) is that the new garb and iteration of Tiana is drawn from “synergy machine” efforts to tie her into a long-gestating Disney+ series which we may never see.Not in the sense that people mean here, i.e., something that will primarily appeal to little girls. It’s designed to have the same broad appeal as any other family attraction at Disney.
The critics can’t have it both ways: they’re complaining it’s a princess ride even as they’re bemoaning the fact that Tiana isn’t presented in her pretty royal dress.
OK, but that’s a separate criticism from the one I was referring to.Setting aside whether this existing ride lends itself to a “Princess” attraction, many of the critiques (mine included) is that the new garb and iteration of Tiana is drawn from “synergy machine” efforts to tie her into a long-gestating Disney+ series which we may never see.
I don’t think I’ve seen anyone say the last one. She’s probably going to appear in a different princess-ier outfit at the end of the ride anyways… so they can sell more dresses/dolls to children.The critics can’t have it both ways: they’re complaining it’s a princess ride even as they’re bemoaning the fact that Tiana isn’t presented in her pretty royal dress.
It started with the reveal of her adventurer costume last year:I don’t think I’ve seen anyone say the last one.
And continued with the reveal of her animatronic this year:So I guess I’ll be the first one who says they absolutely hate it?
I mean, the water tower looks more like a princess than her.
Why are they doing this to Tiana? They're turning her into a career woman with a mom-hairdo and older vibe, instead of the gorgeous and glamorous young Princess she was introduced to us as?
I don’t think I’ve seen anyone say the last one. She’s probably going to appear in a different princess-ier outfit at the end of the ride anyways… so they can sell more dresses/dolls to children.
Sorry if this has been mentioned, but in the Imagineering Video, there is a quick shot of Tiana in what I'm assuming is her finale celebration dress:
View attachment 779755
Appears all visible scaffolding has come down overnight.
Appears all visible scaffolding has come down overnight.
Now we know why the waterfall was on last night.There was a promo photo shoot overnight
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.