Disney (and others) at the Box Office - Current State of Affairs

TP2000

Well-Known Member
For no good reason, I just Googled the words "Oscars Bump" under the news tab, three full news cycles after the Oscars.

All Google gave me were a half dozen stories about an expecting actress named Vanessa Hudgens who wore a rather lovely and simple maternity dress to the Oscars last Sunday. That's what an Oscars Bump is in 2024 apparently. 🧐


But when I scrolled down a bit past all the maternity-wear articles, I did find this info. And it's fascinating! A reckoning is coming to the Oscars telecast based on its dwindling ratings, when the current TV contract is up for renewal in '28.

 

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Lewis Black isn't replaced, he is back as Anger.

The only two that didn't return are Mindy Kaling and Bill Hader (as Disgust and Fear respectively), both for contract disputes I believe.
I must have heard the voiceover wrong then…it sounded like a female voice over anger…but I probably wasn’t paying close enough attention
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
For no good reason, I just Googled the words "Oscars Bump" under the news tab, three full news cycles after the Oscars.

All Google gave me were a half dozen stories about an expecting actress named Vanessa Hudgens who wore a rather lovely and simple maternity dress to the Oscars last Sunday. That's what an Oscars Bump is in 2024 apparently. 🧐


But when I scrolled down a bit past all the maternity-wear articles, I did find this info. And it's fascinating! A reckoning is coming to the Oscars telecast based on its dwindling ratings, when the current TV contract is up for renewal in '28.

This really shows you don't pay attention to anything Disney, Vanessa Hudgens is a former Disney child actress.
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
As has already been explained to you multiple times:

It. Is. On. A. Streaming. Service.
Oppenheimer is/was as well?

Plenty of movies can be performing well post Oscar Bumps on both.

Like, plenty of Oscar wins back in the day we're at rental locations before streaming services and theaters would still see bumps.

On the recent discussion here of Inside out 2:
Inside out 2 is brining in too many new characters is my takeaway(only going by the trailer thus far besides losing important voice actors from cast)
Box office will definitely be interesting with animation being on a rise for some studios and hurting badly for others.
 
Last edited:

Sirwalterraleigh

Premium Member
Oppenheimer is/was as well?

Plenty of movies can be performing well post Oscar Bumps on both.

Like, plenty of Oscar wins back in the day we're at rental locations before streaming services and theaters would still see bumps.

On the recent discussion here of Inside out 2:
Inside out 2 is brining in too many new characters is my takeaway(only from trailer besides losing important voice actors from cast)
Box office will definitely be interesting with animation being on a rise for some studios and hurting badly for others.
Inside out 2 is a huge title for Disney

So 2023 was an unmitigated disaster…but it could be a one off?

Elemental underperformed…but hung around and scratched and clawed its way back to almost level.

Will inside out keep momentum from that?

I doubt it’s a billion dollar film for Pixar…but in that next bracket below would be huge
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Inside out 2 is a huge title for Disney

So 2023 was an unmitigated disaster…but it could be a one off?

Elemental underperformed…but hung around and scratched and clawed its way back to almost level.

Will inside out keep momentum from that?

I doubt it’s a billion dollar film for Pixar…but in that next bracket below would be huge
I was shocked not to see a trailer for it before Kung Fu Panda 4 for the target marketing going heavy now. A lot of animation in the next six months though.
 
Last edited:

DKampy

Well-Known Member
Oppenheimer is/was as well?

Plenty of movies can be performing well post Oscar Bumps on both.

Like, plenty of Oscar wins back in the day were at rental locations before streaming services and theaters would still see bumps.
Yes I expected Oppenheimer to get a bump… but I don’t know how big of a bump it got… as I would not of been surprised if it flew past Poor things… as it won the big award (best film) but it does not appear to be doing any better than Poor Things is doing currently… adding quite a bit more theaters will certainly bump a film… I think if it was not for the Oscars Poor Things would certainly drop off a lot more as tends to happen once a film
Moves to streaming

It’s not the same as back in the day… when people don’t have to leave their couch and can watch a movie at home for no extra charge
 

celluloid

Well-Known Member
Yes I expected Oppenheimer to get a bump… but I don’t know how big of a bump it got… as I would not of been surprised if it flew past Poor things… as it won the big award (best film) but it does not appear to be doing any better than Poor Things is doing currently… adding quite a bit more theaters will certainly bump a film… I think if it was not for the Oscars Poor Things would certainly drop off a lot more as tends to happen once a film
Moves to streaming

It’s not the same as back in the day… when people don’t have to leave their couch and can watch a movie at home for no extra charge
Irrelevant to what Buddy just posted. He claimed Poor things did not get a bump because it is available on streaming.

The fact that people don't have to leave their couch, but people still did for Oppenheimer and The Holdovers back says that people are watching it from both sources.

Peacock actually gets you two Oscar bump movies we are discussing here. And both had huge theater increase. If people don't get off their couches much anymore, but still did even when they can just watch both on a streaming service...that tells you how Poor things did not benefit theatrically as.kuch from this.

Oppenheimer today snuck just below Poor Things as it grew since yesterday's amount.(An amazing 299 percent from the bump it already has Monday and Tuesday post Oscars) I suspect there is a chance by weekend it will stay right below it or pass Poor Things. Also take into account even more impressive as before The Oscars, Oppenheimer was one of the top seen films of the year and grossed over three times it's budget domestically and towards a billion internationally.
 
Last edited:

TalkingHead

Well-Known Member
Oppenheimer also has the benefit of being an experience-it-on-the-big-screen movie. Poor Things wasn’t sold to the public that way. Holdovers may have benefited from its gentler R rating as well.

Searchlight will be distributing a new Yorgos/Emma release in a few months. In neither case was Searchlight the production company, it seems, so I assume they have less input on the creative end of things..?
 

Farerb

Well-Known Member
I watched Poor Things (that movie that people here have been talking about all the time). I love Emma Stone, but this movie was atrocious, the only word that describes this movie perfectly that I can think about is DEPRAVED. Mark Ruffalo is annoying, I can't see him on my screen anymore.
For some odd reason people compared this film to Barbie. One thing that should be clear to anyone by merely watching the two is that Barbie was made by a woman and Poor Things was clearly not. Barbie should have won Costumes and Production Design.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
I watched Poor Things (that movie that people here have been talking about all the time). I love Emma Stone, but this movie was atrocious, the only word that describes this movie perfectly that I can think about is DEPRAVED. Mark Ruffalo is annoying, I can't see him on my screen anymore.
For some odd reason people compared this film to Barbie. One thing that should be clear to anyone by merely watching the two is that Barbie was made by a woman and Poor Things was clearly not. Barbie should have won Costumes and Production Design.
No one here claimed it was for everyone, or compared it to Barbie that I’m aware. It is certainly an arthouse film and you are entitled to your opinion but would not label it depraved.
 

Disney Irish

Premium Member
Oh, is she? From which century?

I'm fairly positive she wasn't on the Mickey Mouse Club in my day, because most of those Mouseketeers are dead now. :(
This century of course. She starred in all the High School Musical movies from almost a decade ago.

I never watched any of those movies but I at least know about them as I follow Disney. This just shows even more how much you really don’t follow anything to do with this company.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom