• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

News 'Beyond Big Thunder Mountain' Blue Sky concept revealed for Magic Kingdom

doctornick

Well-Known Member
It gets its water from a canal that feeds into SSL. The Electrical Water Pageant barges are stored there. There would have to be a bridge that goes over or around it.

View attachment 766296
Naturally. The only option to avoiding at least one bridge would be to fill in all or part of the RoA and personally I hate that idea.

I am hoping they continue the path from the far side of the Frontierland RR station (near the Splash exit) going north and build the guest bridge over the canal to the SSL. That could enable the RoA to mostly be intact, they the might need some infill near HM to make a guest path along that going north.

A bridge over that canal would obviously need to be able to be raised but almost never during park hours. The bridge in Epcot WS functions fine and most guests probably don’t realize it’s there until it gets raised for the fireworks barges.
 

MisterPenguin

President of Animal Kingdom
Premium Member
Any major expansion to the Magic Kingdom would almost require some new firework viewing location with a place for projections.

There's already not enough room for fireworks viewing, and anything that substantially increased attendance would be a disaster. People would still want to see fireworks from in front of the castle (as they always have) but having a secondary location would be incredibly helpful (they basically eliminated the previously existing secondary locations when they made projections a major part of the show).
See my sig. :D
 

Purduevian

Well-Known Member
Any major expansion to the Magic Kingdom would almost require some new firework viewing location with a place for projections.

There's already not enough room for fireworks viewing, and anything that substantially increased attendance would be a disaster. People would still want to see fireworks from in front of the castle (as they always have) but having a secondary location would be incredibly helpful (they basically eliminated the previously existing secondary locations when they made projections a major part of the show).
While not nearly as popular as main street/castle. At Disneyland they have water projections on the ROA and on it's a small world. MK's ROA water front is quite a bit more crowded than DL, however adding a water projector in front of Liberty Tree tavern and another one outside of Big Thunder, would be a good first (and pretty cheap) step.
 

aladdin2007

Well-Known Member
Personally, I also think that's a valid concern.

It seems to me like this might be a calculated move to double down on their heaviest hitter in the face of Epic Universe. New things at MK are probably more likely to incite WDW vacations than new things at any of the other parks. Despite the fact that the other parks are absolutely much more in need of expansion and new attractions than MK is.

Not to mention the collateral damage that might be done to MK to enable the expansion.
Im sure TDO can't wait to anchor the riverboat, they have wanted to for years. Another piece of charm to remove, and an operating expense they would love to slash....I just wish they would utilize all the empty spaces first before reworking or expanding the park.
 
Last edited:

EricsBiscuit

Well-Known Member
While not nearly as popular as main street/castle. At Disneyland they have water projections on the ROA and on it's a small world. MK's ROA water front is quite a bit more crowded than DL, however adding a water projector in front of Liberty Tree tavern and another one outside of Big Thunder, would be a good first (and pretty cheap) step.
Sorry but MK’s RoA is nowhere near as crowded as DL’s.
IMG_8291.jpeg

Im sure TDO can't wait to anchor the riverboat, they have wanted to for years. Another piece of charm to remove, and an operating expense they would love to slash....I just wish they would utilize all the empty spaces first before reworking or expanding the park.
They just spent millions of dollars refurbishing it only a year or two ago.
 

yensidtlaw1969

Well-Known Member
Sorry but MK’s RoA is nowhere near as crowded as DL’s.View attachment 766338

They just spent millions of dollars refurbishing it only a year or two ago.
I'm not sure that's the kind of crowded they were talking about - the Riverfront at Disneyland keeps its vista pretty wide open for the sake of Fantasmic viewing, but the Riverfront at Walt Disney World has no equivalent show and has a bunch of "stuff" right on the edge of the water that would block the guest's view from the pathways. Compare:

Disneyland:

Screenshot 2024-02-02 at 7.06.26 AM.png




Magic Kingdom:

Screenshot 2024-02-02 at 7.06.58 AM.png


(These 2 images are not scaled to each other, BTW)
 

EricsBiscuit

Well-Known Member
I'm not sure that's the kind of crowded they were talking about - the Riverfront at Disneyland keeps its vista pretty wide open for the sake of Fantasmic viewing, but the Riverfront at Walt Disney World has no equivalent show and has a bunch of "stuff" right on the edge of the water that would block the guest's view from the pathways. Compare:

Disneyland:

View attachment 766430



Magic Kingdom:

View attachment 766431

(These 2 images are not scaled to each other, BTW)
There’s definitely more obscuring the view but the boardwalk has lots of space for viewing if they added Fantasmic style projections. They should do. Both that and add projections to the back of the castle to relieve congestion on Main Street.
 

Purduevian

Well-Known Member
Sorry but MK’s RoA is nowhere near as crowded as DL’s.

They just spent millions of dollars refurbishing it only a year or two ago.

I'm not sure that's the kind of crowded they were talking about - the Riverfront at Disneyland keeps its vista pretty wide open for the sake of Fantasmic viewing, but the Riverfront at Walt Disney World has no equivalent show and has a bunch of "stuff" right on the edge of the water that would block the guest's view from the pathways. Compare:
Yeah sorry I wasn't more clear, DLR has very few obstructions between the main pathway and the river. Here is a street view of what I was talking about:
1706899129498.png


1706899190130.png

Magic Kingdom does have a few openings as mentioned before: Outside of liberty tree tavern:
1706899325997.png

Outside Big Thunder:
1706899373274.png


I would love a good alternative fireworks location, but I also don't want to loose all the shade from all those trees.
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
The pathways around the ROA were more like ours before they added Fantasmic, then it was expanded for viewing... I think the Disneyland waterway is wider...
 

_caleb

Well-Known Member
The pathways around the ROA were more like ours before they added Fantasmic, then it was expanded for viewing... I think the Disneyland waterway is wider...
And us Disneylanders were not happy about it even back then. Turning the entire area into an unshaded, unthemed amphitheater is one of those ideas that looks great on a whiteboard, but in reality, it created HUGE traffic issues (especially in the second half of each day).
 

Bocabear

Well-Known Member
And us Disneylanders were not happy about it even back then. Turning the entire area into an unshaded, unthemed amphitheater is one of those ideas that looks great on a whiteboard, but in reality, it created HUGE traffic issues (especially in the second half of each day).
I would agree...But many feel like the show was worth it... It certainly was amazing for it's day, and is still a draw...
 

Animaniac93-98

Well-Known Member
In hindsight, had they not shoehorned Frozen into EPCOT they way they did, a bigger version of World of Frozen would have been an ideal candidate for this proposed expansion.

Have the castle be big enough for a restaurant and meet and greet, build the flat ride that HKDL scrapped in favor off the coaster, but build that and make it longer too, along with a better boat ride.

Then Maelstrom could have been kept and upgraded, and the plot between Norway and Mexico could have been used for something else like Coco.

What could have been...
 

DisneyDean97

Well-Known Member
In hindsight, had they not shoehorned Frozen into EPCOT they way they did, a bigger version of World of Frozen would have been an ideal candidate for this proposed expansion.

Have the castle be big enough for a restaurant and meet and greet, build the flat ride that HKDL scrapped in favor off the coaster, but build that and make it longer too, along with a better boat ride.

Then Maelstrom could have been kept and upgraded, and the plot between Norway and Mexico could have been used for something else like Coco.

What could have been...
They wanted to get Frozen into the parks ASAP after realizing how popular the film became, re-theming a ride is much faster... especially when we're talking about the speed (or lack there of) that Disney builds at.
And while the idea works for a park like HKDL, I don't believe the Magic Kingdom needs any single IP lands, a Frozen ride sure, but not an entire land, taking up valuable space in the busiest theme park in the world for a singular IP land just doesn't feel right :)
 

MagicHappens1971

Well-Known Member
They wanted to get Frozen into the parks ASAP after realizing how popular the film became, re-theming a ride is much faster... especially when we're talking about the speed (or lack there of) that Disney builds at.
And while the idea works for a park like HKDL, I don't believe the Magic Kingdom needs any single IP lands, a Frozen ride sure, but not an entire land, taking up valuable space in the busiest theme park in the world for a singular IP land just doesn't feel right :)
I think had they sat back and looked at the big picture, also had they known that Frozen was gonna be such a big hit, it probably would’ve been where Storybook Circus is now. Just a hunch.

I don’t think Disney will build a “single-IP” land in MK anytime soon, but I think Beyond Big Thunder (or whatever becomes of that) will be pretty darn close.
 

DisneyDean97

Well-Known Member
I think had they sat back and looked at the big picture, also had they known that Frozen was gonna be such a big hit, it probably would’ve been where Storybook Circus is now. Just a hunch.

I don’t think Disney will build a “single-IP” land in MK anytime soon, but I think Beyond Big Thunder (or whatever becomes of that) will be pretty darn close.
Agreed. Either way, that New Fantasyland expansion should have added one more dark ride, even it was on the scale of Pooh, there should have been one more addition.
 

aladdin2007

Well-Known Member
Agreed. Either way, that New Fantasyland expansion should have added one more dark ride, even it was on the scale of Pooh, there should have been one more addition.
agree, and instead they took one away when it could have been remade into another. This having to replace something for something else is really tired in their inept short sighted management. And while it can still be done one day, none of us in our lifetimes here will probably ever see a ride in that space again.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom