yensidtlaw1969
Well-Known Member
Is that any different from adding a BatB sing a long to one park after there was already a show in another park and already a mini-land with an enhanced M&G and dining in another park?
Not really, in the sense that most people felt the Studios show should have ended with the opening of New Fantasyland. Same for Voyage of the Little Mermaid, given the ride opening at MK. But those are a *little* different because both are advertised as theatrical stage shows being performed in "Hollywood" as opposed to purporting that you've entered the world of the character, which both Journey of Water and the proposed AK expansion would. Still, the redundancy is unnecessary and smacks of some poor planning.
I don't think anyone here thinks that the BatB sing-along in the France Pavilion was a good idea.
Sometimes I imagine what it'd be like if rearranging Walt Disney World were as simple as picking up pieces on a chessboard - there are some amazing thematic opportunities that were missed simply because one thing was put in one park before another thing was put in another. All the Nemo stuff should be in one place. All the Toy Story stuff should be in another. And Beauty and the Beast, and Moana, and so on.
Make one great space that celebrates a story full-tilt instead of peppering it across the resort.