ToTBellHop
Well-Known Member
They’d replace it with an ikran, or as we call it, a banshee.If Avatar 2 makes 17 trillion dollars, Disney might be able to afford to fix the Yeti!
They’d replace it with an ikran, or as we call it, a banshee.If Avatar 2 makes 17 trillion dollars, Disney might be able to afford to fix the Yeti!
***only available with Disney Genie+++*only at Disneyland
I know this is a joke, but it would be cool if Disney could create some realistic animatronic banshees.They’d replace it with an ikran, or as we call it, a banshee.
Pandora really is screaming for some large scale AAs of the cool fauna from the movie. It absolutely befuddles me that they didn’t have some at land opening whether as part of NRJ or with some sort of walk through animal trail.I know this is a joke, but it would be cool if Disney could create some realistic animatronic banshees.
That's not the theme but okay, thanks for attempting to one up me. God I hate theme park fans.Nope, the themes of the park are as follows:
- The intrinsic and superior value of nature – this means that nature, above all else is at the forefront of the design. This leads to parts of the park being out of their true control (live animals, overgrown pathways, etc.).
- Transformation through adventure – this idea is that adventure changes people when they experience something they’ve never experienced before.
- Personal call to action – a sense of responsibility for the animals and the conservation message.
HmmmmThat's not the theme but okay, thanks for attempting to one up me. God I hate theme park fans.
When you look at the response to Frozen they didn't do much for years and in the end not much at all so I don't get the mindset that if a movie does pretty well it automatically deserves a land in a park? Movies are made all the time and a land sticks around well beyond it's sell by date so maybe theme park fans are just starved for new content? Stale grampas may be taking their toll?I don't get the push for Moana. That movie did well, but not *that* well...
Especially when considering a park such as AK, I wish Disney would stop playing games already and add the IP that will never go out of style aka Lion King!I don't get the push for Moana. That movie did well, but not *that* well...
I don't get the push for Moana. That movie did well, but not *that* well...
Of course he does.Moana is routinely the top mainstay for Disney+. Its outperforming frozen recently.
Encanto likely will be number one streamed movie this year (on any platform not just D+), turning Red second then Moana third. The difference is Moana is not a new release. It’s just that strong.
You can bet Chapek takes notice of its ongoing streaming performance.
1. This is a weird place to hang out if you hate theme park fans.That's not the theme but okay, thanks for attempting to one up me. God I hate theme park fans.
That's not the theme but okay, thanks for attempting to one up me. God I hate theme park fans.
Exactly, took 7 years for a green lit concept like Tron to open. This is all fan service nonsense, they have nothing new that is not green lit that will be up and running in next 10 years.These blue skies reeked of “we arent giving florida anything?” “Go out then and just show some stuff we arent going to do, stress its blue sky”
Well. One of us will be correct in 2032.Exactly, took 7 years for a green lit concept like Tron to open. This is all fan service nonsense, they have nothing new that is not green lit that will be up and running in next 10 years.
If this were the 90's you would be surprised how many VHS copies would have been sold by now. This movie is streamed constantly in households with kids 2-8 years old.I don't get the push for Moana. That movie did well, but not *that* well...
My brother you are on a theme park forumThat's not the theme but okay, thanks for attempting to one up me. God I hate theme park fans.
I think these are more of the core values of the park, which then overlay into
The different themed lands we have today.
While not the overall theme, Originally the park did want to focus on the 3 sections: real, extinct, and imaginary. This structure was a primary focus in the parks first years of operation. Which those would then have something to do With the above you mentioned. The theme of animal kingdom is complex
Stop it, they're themes.That's not the theme but okay, thanks for attempting to one up me. God I hate theme park fans.
Pandora the land, is amazing, especially at night. Na'vi River is terrible. Either way, "alien land" is not the same as Earth; past, present and myth. I would find Dragons, Griffins, etc more acceptable to the ethos of DAK. The Banshee are very cool though.The theme integration of Pandora into DAK is flawless. I will die on this hill. You can argue about the quality of the attractions all you want, but they nailed the integration into Animal Kingdom. It is the best example of adding a land to an existing park without diluting the original themes of that park. Anyone that says otherwise, has no idea what they're talking about.
We seek out Beastly Kingdom because we think we know what it is. The original land was a hedge maze and a dragon themed roller coaster. That's not really what the park needs right now.
Ice Age, the theme, not the movie, would be great. The movie, especially how doofy the main character is, seems more like a spoof than an honest attempt to show Ice Age animals/experiences. I get it's for kids, but it's low-brow for Disney to associate.Ice Age would be a far better choice for a Dino-Rama replacement. Disney owns it now, it's about prehistoric animals, and that Buck Wild movie shows that Disney still wants to milk the franchise.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.