I am pretty sure that you are correct however Disney is just going to have to bite the bullet and do it. If they have a course of action they simply need to take it at this point. Sure people are going to be upset, they get upset with every ride closure, but the sooner they start the sooner it will be done.Correct me if I'm wrong, but Yeti repairs are not really a cost issue, but rather a downtime issue.
Although frustrating, I can understand their reluctance to take EE out of service for several weeks. That one attraction drives much of AK's attendance. (If they were afraid of what a SM rehab would do to MK's attraction-filled park, imagine the thought of closing 1/4 of AK's E-Ticket rides.)
Correct me if I'm wrong, but Yeti repairs are not really a cost issue, but rather a downtime issue.
Although frustrating, I can understand their reluctance to take EE out of service for several weeks. That one attraction drives much of AK's attendance. (If they were afraid of what a SM rehab would do to MK's attraction-filled park, imagine the thought of closing 1/4 of AK's E-Ticket rides.)
That makes no sense whatsoever. Should a car designer be fired because you can take the transmission out while driving? You can't just "pop" out a 22' AA like a video card. The yeti is beyond huge and the giant part that we see is not even half of it. there is an enormous support structure behind it as well as the actual foundation.So they can't rip the yetti out witout closing the ride? If that is true whoever designed the ride should be fiered.
That makes no sense whatsoever. Should a car designer be fired because you can take the transmission out while driving? You can't just "pop" out a 22' AA like a video card. The yeti is beyond huge and the giant part that we see is not even half of it. there is an enormous support structure behind it as well as the actual foundation.
Then it's stupid to design a ride around a single AA, they had to have assumed it would need to come out at some point. The car analogy doesn't work because there isn't any other ride besides stich that is designed around a single AA, stupid desicon. If a single AA breaks on SSE or Dinosaur do they shut the whole ride down for an extended period of time? They shoud have designed the ride so he could be taken out easily for matinence. This was bad planning
Then it's stupid to design a ride around a single AA, they had to have assumed it would need to come out at some point. The car analogy doesn't work because there isn't any other ride besides stich that is designed around a single AA, stupid desicon. If a single AA breaks on SSE or Dinosaur do they shut the whole ride down for an extended period of time? They shoud have designed the ride so he could be taken out easily for matinence. This was bad planning
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.