ImagineerDude
Well-Known Member
Unless Disney Dreams is coming from DLP in time for my trip in 2014, then NO absolutely NOT Wishes must stay!!! Even though it's like, what, ten years old now???
Unless Disney Dreams is coming from DLP in time for my trip in 2014, then NO absolutely NOT Wishes must stay!!! Even though it's like, what, ten years old now???
Not happening yet.MK is getting a new parade and hopefully a new castle show sometime soon and new fireworks would go well with this.
Not happening yet.
The Dreams style proposal was axed.
Thank goodness. The last thing WDW needs is to try to do firework shows without proper fireworks - as DLP is forced to do.Not happening yet.
The Dreams style proposal was axed.
Thank goodness. The last thing WDW needs is to try to do firework shows without fireworks - as DLP is forced to do.
LOL I exaggerate (it does have fireworks), but due to restrictions, DLP does not have any large scale pyro, nothing along the lines of the massive pyro that is launched with Wishes, or even the smaller stuff that is fired for IllumiNations. DLP has pyro more like Fantasmic.wow, I didnt know that Dreams doesnt have actual fireworks, I'll have to pull it up on youtube.
Thank goodness. The last thing WDW needs is to try to do firework shows without proper fireworks - as DLP is forced to do.
True, but why not incorporate the new effects of shows like Dreams with the massive pyro of a show like Wishes? (fountains, projections, other lighting or laser effects, etc.)
Indeed. A Dreams! type presentation was proposed, and would have seen more limited pyro at the MK. Whilst some DLP tech may eventually be used in WDW I'd hope the traditional big bangs in the sky over the castle type show continues.Thank goodness. The last thing WDW needs is to try to do firework shows without proper fireworks - as DLP is forced to do.
Well we all know that in an ideal world that would be great, but we also know that in the real world it does not work like that. To fund that show they would be looking for cost savings by reducing the pyro, and I think you could say goodbye to the large scale pyro.True, but why not incorporate the new effects of shows like Dreams with the massive pyro of a show like Wishes? (fountains, projections, other lighting or laser effects, etc.)
Well we all know that in an ideal world that would be great, but we also know that in the real world it does not work like that. To fund that show they would be looking for cost savings by reducing the pyro, and I think you could say goodbye to the large scale pyro.
Anyhow, Epcot is the place for lasers, lighting and projections. For me, lasers look completely wrong on the castle.
Yes absolutely. My only concern when people bring up DLP is that their approach leads to a reduction in pyro, which I don't think is a good thing.Ok, maybe not lasers.
But why not incorporate the castle projections, along with some waterway fountains and Main Street (and other areas) lighting effects? A theme park operator that seeks to always improve its offerings and continually "exceed guest expectations" should be doing this, right?
Also for the person that said magical was better than Wishes have you seen the show live? Wishes uses more fireworks than Magical and in my opinion is still a far better show. Unless a replacement show for wishes keeping the same scale of pyro is planned I'm happy with Wishes staying put.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.