mickEblu
Well-Known Member
The whole film was an allegory about immigration. Its creator tied it explicitly to themes of representation.
I don’t think anyone has a problem with that. Many don’t even notice.
The whole film was an allegory about immigration. Its creator tied it explicitly to themes of representation.
Then I’m very confused by what a good many posters are saying in these threads.I don’t think anyone has a problem with that. Many don’t even notice.
This is exactly what Lightyear and Strange World gave us—gay characters whose sexuality had no bearing on the plot. Yet people are still complaining that’s too much.How about a movie were things like ethnic, gender or orientation is just an attribute of the character and not a huge plot point? Why can't there be a gay character that isn't comic relief but it just another character in the story that happens to be gay but the story has no bearing on it?
Yeah, I’m also struggling to figure out the point of that post.This is exactly what Lightyear and Strange World gave us—gay characters whose sexuality had no bearing on the plot. Yet people are still complaining that’s too much.
Then I’m very confused by what a good many posters are saying in these threads.
This is exactly what Lightyear and Strange World gave us—gay characters whose sexuality had no bearing on the plot. Yet people are still complaining that’s too much.
That doesn't mean they have to be checkbox characters with nothing to do in the plot.Pretty sure you just described all of the ethnic/gender/orientation choices in the three movies I mentioned (Lightyear, Strange World, Wish) where those are all not played for either plot or comic relief, but are simply present.
It’s 2023, not 1953. When exactly will many people be ready????Yes because they were the wrong movies. Many people don’t care for/ aren’t ready for that in PG (cartoons ) for kids.
I don’t know that they are but I could see how it “could” impact the story.I just can’t wrap my head around the idea that good storytelling and DEI are inversely correlated in this way. Such an argument would have us believe that a split-second kiss somehow totally derailed Lightyear, as if nothing else mattered to its writers. A film like Elemental, meanwhile, entirely defies this binary, yet those pushing the either/or framing remain silent on such exceptions to the supposed rule.
At this point, I just want this particular dip in Disney’s fortunes to end so that we can move on from this poisonous Culture War stuff.
It’s 2023, not 1953. When exactly will many people be ready????
It’s 2023, not 1953. When exactly will many people be ready????
Uh huhThat’s not for me to say. I can only speak for myself.
Uh huh
Two underperforming films from last year are proof of nothing. Elemental features a queer couple and ended up doing quite well through word of mouth. Wish has no obviously LGBTQI characters at all and has done barely any better than Strange World.It's 2023 and the free market globally has spoken on those movies. Parents around the world obviously aren't ready for gay themes/characters in children's animation movies. Especially ones branded "Disney".
Two underperforming films from last year are proof of nothing. Elemental features a queer couple and ended up doing quite well through word of mouth. Wish has no obviously LGBTQI characters at all and has done barely any better than Strange World.
That doesn't mean they have to be checkbox characters with nothing to do in the plot.
Looking at the showtimes for my local five-screen theater, Wish is only getting two screenings per day this Friday and Saturday so a reissue of White Christmas can run on the same screen. At the various AMC theaters in the region it's by and large being demoted to one screen. That's better than nothing, but some of the online chatter saying that this weekend will be the point it really legs out and becomes Elemental 2.0 seems awfully optimistic. (Wonka's currently expected to do something like $35 million this weekend, which would be a bit more than Wish managed over the five-day Thanksgiving period.)Wish appears to be simply a mediocre movie that didn't get global audiences to the theater, with or without 2SLGBTQQIA+ characters. The Disney brand has waning cachet now, and audiences aren't stupid with how they spend their own money.
Wish is about the 10th flop in a row for Disney. For various reasons, that are all mostly within Disney's ability to self-correct.
It’s remarkable that you refuse to say the same about films that happen to feature gay characters. That’s the whole problem with the way you and others are framing things: if there’s an obvious scapegoat (“gay themes”, “race-swapping”, etc.), you’ll latch onto it as the cause for box-office disappointment; and if there isn’t, then you’ll simply blame the film’s mediocrity. It’s entirely predictable by now.Wish appears to be simply a mediocre movie that didn't get global audiences to the theater
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.