With the exception of the lion king, why is it that no mother seems safe when it comes to a Disney story. They either are dead or just not present. Does anybody know why it seems this way?
Peter Pan - Mother quite alive, Mr. and Mrs Darling go out for the evening.
Lion King - Mother quite alive, King Mufasa and Queen Sarabi bring Simba into the world.
Mary Poppins - Mother quite alive, an active Suffragette.
Toy Story - Mother quite alive, only ankles and the hem of her skirt are seen, but she's there.
101 Dalmatians - Mothers quite alive, Pongo and Perdita are owned by Roger and Anita.
Mary Poppins - Mother quite alive, an active Suffragette.
I suppose it could be argued that his mother's death played a role, as it was rather tramaazing to him, but I'm not sure as to which movies were made before her death and which after...I don't think there's any Freudian deep-seated loathing of all things motherly in Walt himself. :lol:
Cinderella: Mother is missing
Here we see another possible reason: why devote screen time to characters not integral to the story?In the original drafts of Aladdin, he did have a mother. I believe there was even a song surrounding that (trying to recall what I saw on the DVD). But they cut that part out in the final drafts.
I'm talking about the majority of the Disney Movies.
Finding Nemo: Mother eaten in first five minutes
![]()
Here we see another possible reason: why devote screen time to characters not integral to the story?
The same was done for The Lion King 1&1/2. Timon's father was originally in the script, but never made the final cut.
One of my favorites too :lol:Best Disney sequel ever! :sohappy:
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.