Missing20K
Well-Known Member
The three on the left.
EDIT: It's seemingly impossible to find a google image of Iger and Chapek with no one else in frame.
They save on labor and building costs. I’m not talking just about reduced staff but the total peak capacity of the park and its venues. As I said in a previous post, Magic Kingdom has less dining capacity and it is because Disney has successfully conditioned its audience to accept, and in some causes even praise, planning months in advance, waiting longer and eating at odd hours.You know, I keep hearing that, but I've yet to understand what Disney gains by decreased capacity. Seem like all they would get out of it would be angry, frustrated Guests. I'm really am asking because I cannot understand it. Could you or someone explain it to me? I must be missing something that puts it all in focus.
You're dead on - it's like some mass hypnosis they've achieved. When I was at WDW recently, you could hear so many conversations of people bragging they got a dinner reservation at 4:00 pm months in advance or got their FP for Jungle Cruise two months ago! Again, not complaining about how insane having to plan where you eat lunch and when you ride the tea cups on vacation months in advance, but actually feeling proud they understood and worked the system.They save on labor and building costs. I’m not talking just about reduced staff but the total peak capacity of the park and its venues. As I said in a previous post, Magic Kingdom has less dining capacity and it is because Disney has successfully conditioned its audience to accept, and in some causes even praise, planning months in advance, waiting longer and eating at odd hours.
And if less costs does not equal less attendance and less spending, then they are encouraged to keep cutting. That is what is crazy about the Disney situation, I can't remember many consumer situations like this, but good to be them right now.
That part I partially understand and how they make short term profit, but line attractions, with trains or omni's are filling up as fast as they can be filled up, the number of CM's is pretty irrelevant. That's the first thing and the second is they are in a public service business and not accommodating the customer eventually catches up with every public service establishment. It is like investing in a brick and mortar attraction in that it is investing in the enjoyment of the people that they are relying on for income. I guess that they only thing they are concerned about is today with absolutely no thought about the future. They are not failure proof, contrary to the belief of some.
The three on the left.
EDIT: It's seemingly impossible to find a google image of Iger and Chapek with no one else in frame.
Yes, but I get great joy out of my new iPhone 11 Pro and its faster processor, better camera, etc. They are delivering on a positive experience that will then make me sign up for the next one.Not exactly like that, but its the same as many companies operate.
Look at iPhones (and the top end Samsung phones now) - they make more on each phone than they did years ago, and they sell even more of them each year.
Yes, but I get great joy out of my new iPhone 11 Pro and it's faster processor, better camera, etc. They are delivering on a positive experience that will then make me sign up for the next one.
This is an entirely different phenomenon - Disney is charging top dollar and providing a terrible guest experience (just today the lines for Snow White, Space, FOP, Safaris were all over 2 1/2 hours), only a small percentage can get on the headliner new attraction, Epcot is a construction zone, higher prices throughout, lower levels of service/quality, and just a much less enjoyable overall experience than years ago. And in SPITE of all of that, people are lining up to pay the prices, deal with jam packed crowds, etc.
One would have thought these negative experiences in a world of social media would just be killing the parks now, but those Instagram desserts and shots in front of the castle are like gold. I find it truly fascinating.
We're talking past each other - I am not criticizing Disney, I am talking about the fascinating dynamic of the consumer eagerly willing to pay more for a diminished experience. Every company works to improve margin, of course, but this is a situation where Disney openly is telling the consumer their experience is not important to them, the guests are having bad experiences, and they are still eager to buy the product and pay more for it. Disney is only doing what the guests are allowing them to do - I'm not only not criticizing, I'm jealous! I wish my businesses over the years could just abuse the customers and print money year after year!Fair points, but Apple isn't the only example. Plenty of places use the 'less for more' methodology to influence their bottom line. Shrinkflation in foods, for example.
By no means am I excusing Disney. Running a company that has never done better like its going out of business is inexcusable. But they aren't the only perpetrators.
You're dead on - it's like some mass hypnosis they've achieved. When I was at WDW recently, you could hear so many conversations of people bragging they got a dinner reservation at 4:00 pm months in advance or got their FP for Jungle Cruise two months ago! Again, not complaining about how insane having to plan where you eat lunch and when you ride the tea cups on vacation months in advance, but actually feeling proud they understood and worked the system. All I could think of was "Thank you, sir, may I have another!"
My guess is there’s enough of a percentage of people who either don’t know they have bought into a diminished experience (first timers and once in a lifetimers) or genuinely don’t feel a diminished experience. Some folks just have a rosy perspective. I’d be hard pressed to come up with how my experience has diminished in the last 20-odd years other than pricing going up and the loss of the potato-wrapped snapper at the Flying Fish.We're talking past each other - I am not criticizing Disney, I am talking about the fascinating dynamic of the consumer eagerly willing to pay more for a diminished experience. Every company works to improve margin, of course, but this is a situation where Disney openly is telling the consumer their experience is not important to them, the guests are having bad experiences, and they are still eager to buy the product and pay more for it. Disney is only doing what the guests are allowing them to do - I'm not only not criticizing, I'm jealous! I wish my businesses over the years could just abuse the customers and print money year after year!
But, but... where would that leave Katiebug?Disney quiz on the very basics of the company after you get off the monorail/ferryboat/bus...1-10, True/False. If you don’t get a score of 90% or higher, you have to turn right back around and leave. And Disney keeps your parking fee if you drove .
I’d be hard pressed to come up with how my experience has diminished in the last 20-odd years other than pricing going up
.... the consumer eagerly willing to pay more for a diminished experience ...... this is a situation where Disney openly is telling the consumer their experience is not important to them, the guests are having bad experiences
We're talking past each other - I am not criticizing Disney, I am talking about the fascinating dynamic of the consumer eagerly willing to pay more for a diminished experience.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.