d'Isigny said:
Birnbuams was my first...and my favorite...
I don't mind if it is promo...because I like the fact that it paints a positive picture and allows you to draw your own conclusion. I don't want to read about someone's skewed criticism of Disney through the eyes of an over analytical "adult". These same people will board Peter Pans Flight and see only a slow moving ride through simple animatronics. Me, I'm transported...I love going past Big Ben and seeing the model of the city with force perspective...the little cars moving on the street...the artistry...
I think that many would argue that because the Official Guide paints a rosy picture, it is too biased to allow the traveler to get an accurate account of the experience. I'm not bashing the Official Guide, I think it is good in terms of generating excitement, but it is inbalanced as to providing a "this is how it is" viewpoint.
As far as the over analytical adult reviews, here are a few from some of the Fantasyland dark rides:
"...beautiful effects, and charming music...", "Happy, mellow and well done; ****" - Peter Pan's Flight
"The attention to detail and special effects on this ride make it worth seeing even if you don't have children in your party...", "Cute as the Pooh-bear himself; *** 1/2" - Many Adv. of Winnie the Pooh
The worst I could find about the Fantasyland attractions were these:
"They were very slow at unloading the boats, and we were stuck in a line of about six boats waiting to get out" - IASW
"tough on preschoolers who are expecting forest animals and dwarves", "Where the hell is Snow White?" -Snow White's Adventures
Are there some things in there that give negative light to an attraction? Yeah, but it gives a balanced view on things.