Originally posted by dxwwf3
Ill first give my reasons against AK and MK. The Animal Kingdom really in actuality needs a ride BETTER than Indy. Now before everyone goes bonkers on me let me explain :lol: With Dinosaur being toned down (still unforgivable in my opinion) and Kali River Rapids while extremely fun, somewhat tame, the AK really needs a THRILL ride. Something, in my opinion since the CTX-Dinosaur change, that it completely lacks. An inverted coaster, flying coaster, drop ride, etc.... is what AK needs right now more than anything. Indy would fit wonderfully in the MK but in my opinion they should focus KEEPING the attractions already there (Alien Encounter (in its current form), Timekeeper, and Carousel of Progress come to mind) before worrying about building new ones.
So now why I voted for MGM. With the Rock 'N' Roller Coaster, Twilight Zone Tower of Terror, and at night Fantasmic all in basically the same area there is always a major clog in Sunset Blvd. There also seems to be a little bit of crowd decline at Star Tours, Muppet Vision 3-D, and to a lesser extent Indiana Jones Epic Stunt Spectatular. So what if the new Star Tours film and a new Indiana Jones ride opened around the same time. I believe we would see MUCH better park crowd flow. It would probably increase attendence at the attractions mentioned aboe and that would also increase attendence in the attractions in between (Sounds Dangerous, Great Movie Ride, if something finally goes into the ABC Theatre :lol: ). I really think that addition would really benefit MGM more than any other park right now so they could focus their attention on boosting AK and Epcot attendence over the next 10 years or so. In a way it would sort of "complete" MGM for the near future. Anyone else agree with me on my points?