AgreedCorrus said:Errr.... and what about Earthquake...
Nothing happened...
Even the special effects are bad...
Which means... every park has its good and bads
Never meant to start anything.....Corrus said:Oh, Please God... Not again!!!!
Now THAT's one hell of an idea... :kiss:NemoRocks said:Never meant to start anything.....
Let us return to our regularly scheduled posting....![]()
Corrus said:Errr.... and what about Earthquake...
Nothing happened...
Even the special effects are bad...
Which means... every park has its good and bads
Legacy said:(I know it's a stretch, but Imagineering could make something like that work. I just have a problem seeing Stitch without Lilo.)
Stitchfan712 said:With these responses, I am afraid this attraction will never satisfy anyone, in any form. Even with a rescript, it just won't.
There's too many conflicting ideas of what the ride should be. Dark, light, silly, serious, live, animated...etc etc etc.
How can disney ever satisfy this? I don't think they can.
Yep, Pirates is a dark ride.Stitchfan712 said:A dark ride......no offense, but the last thing WDW needs is yet another dark ride.
I'm not a fan of them personally though. I find myself utterly bored on dark rides...unless you consider Pirates to be a dark ride, which I don't.
I think a Stitch ride using a tamer version of Spiderman would be much better then the use of AE format. Imagine going through a building with Stitch bouncing all over the place knocking things about, really trying to escape, as guests follow him around and watch however they are trying to catch him. I am suprised that other parks have not exploited the Spiderman tech. I wonder if it is because Universal has a patent on the tech.Legacy said:Yep, Pirates is a dark ride.
Spiderman is a dark ride too.
So you find dark rides boring. Would a dark ride following Stitch be boring to you, or would you enjoy it? The nice things about dark rides is that they focus on the stories and characters over technology. You seem to love Stitch, and not just the character but the story as well. A dark ride is the most effective device for developing those two things (which would make a better attraction).
Exactly. A Stitch attraction should be active rather than passive (active is high-movement, passive is little movement). AE's technolgy is passive, and that hurts Stitch's character. A dark ride using (relatively) fast vehicles with a lot of movement would be MUCH more Stitch-like and would be a better fit. Set the attaction in Hawaii, have fun looking scenery with a combonation of animatronics and projections. It would be HIGHLY effective, HIGHLY entertaining and actually family-friendly.Lynx04 said:I think a Stitch ride using a tamer version of Spiderman would be much better then the use of AE format. Imagine going through a building with Stitch bouncing all over the place knocking things about, really trying to escape, as guests follow him around and watch however they are trying to catch him. I am suprised that other parks have not exploited the Spiderman tech. I wonder if it is because Universal has a patent on the tech.
That is the old dark ride, rides like:Stitchfan712 said:Perhaps I am misunderstanding what a "dark ride" is.
I'm under the assumption that "Winnie the Pooh" is the definition of a dark ride....as is the Alice in Wonderland attraction at Fantasyland in DLR. I'm thinking the 2-D painted boards with limited movement that you pass by, most of the entertainment comes from the audio.
I find myself bored on these. They feel cheap.
i've always considered a dark ride to be any ride where the environment is primarily responsible for creating the experience (as opposed to say, a roller coaster, where its the motion of the train). While Indiana Jones certainly has a thrilling ride experience (speed+jerkiness), its really the temple itself and the show elements that make it work. (as opposed to SM or BTMRR where the effects enhance the motion of the roller coaster).Stitchfan712 said:Perhaps I am misunderstanding what a "dark ride" is.
I think you've hit the nail right on the head here, sitting in the dark while Stitch does things TO you just doesn't fit the "feel" of L&S. Can you imagine the Haunted Mansion as a high speed chase? Pirates without the rollicking motion of the boat? Of course not, and that's why sitting in the dark worked great for a hideous alien beast, but NOT a hyperactive ball o' destructive fluff. A better idea for a Stitch attraction (to keep the intergalactic police recruits theme) would have been a frantic chase to simply keep up and try to minimize the damage 626 is creating (if only they would have retrofit Mr. Toad to THAT ride).Legacy said:A Stitch attraction should be active rather than passive (active is high-movement, passive is little movement). AE's technolgy is passive, and that hurts Stitch's character. A dark ride using (relatively) fast vehicles with a lot of movement would be MUCH more Stitch-like and would be a better fit.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.