jloucks
Well-Known Member
Global destination statusHow can supply be maxed when Walt Disney World has two parks worth of offerings spread across two parks?
Global destination statusHow can supply be maxed when Walt Disney World has two parks worth of offerings spread across two parks?
That means nothing. A fifth gate is new attractions no different than new attractions in the existing parks. The difference is that one option is far more expensive than the other.Global destination status
Here is what it means. Much more steady demand. When there is no holiday here, there is someplace else on the planet. Park always full.That means nothing. A fifth gate is new attractions no different than new attractions in the existing parks. The difference is that one option is far more expensive than the other.
Epcot has lots of room to thin out the crowds. I think for the size and what's there now Epcot is the most underutilized park Disney has. DAK gets crowded to point where I don't like it and it's hard to get around but they seem to be addressing that right now.
IMO, Disney should never add a fifth park. It doesn't make any sense. The average American family takes vacations one week at a time. A fifth park would give you more to do than can ever be done in a week. Yet that family can only take that one week of vacation time. There's no reason to make the investment in a fifth park if you won't be able to get people to stay any longer.
Attractions do add area that is occupied by guests.Here is what it means. Much more steady demand. When there is no holiday here, there is someplace else on the planet. Park always full.
The parks are packed. Beyond comfort levels. Unless you add sq footage any attraction you add is going to 'attract' more bodies and exacerbate the crowd (supply) issue. A new park increases sq footage (supply) and addresses the crowding. ...one of my top irritants with the parks. More so than minor quality issues. Obviously some love massive crowds and want to make it even more cozy. Not me.
They also draw MORE guests.Attractions do add area that is occupied by guests.
Depends on the scale. The Orlando market is overly obsessed with marquee attractions.They also draw MORE guests.
No 5th park, ever. Disney learned with Animal Kingdom that additional parks will no longer get the average guest to extend their stay. Now that more and more people are exclusively going to the Magic Kingdom... you think they're thinking about a fifth gate?
Right now the thought of a fifth Disney gate disgusts me, but that's only because the resort has three underutilized parks already that need some serious love.
DHS is only staying afloat due to Frozen Summer Fun at this point. Once Epcot takes the Frozen crowds away, and Little Mermaid/LMA close down, DHS will start to decline in attendance. Or TDO will fudge an attendance increase or a flat number by shifting some from Epcot/MK.Disney is learning some real lessons from Hollywood Studios, and not in a good way for us.
Attendance has barely shifted, yet half the park has closed, costs are down, and the actual offering is minimal. With only a few attractions and short opening hours, lines are long enough that even with a reduced offering the Studios still takes a day out of someone's vacation. In short, guests don't care if the offering is minimal, they will still block out a whole day for a Disney park.
Visitors to Disney really couldn't care less how much there is to do, what quality it is or how expensive it is, they just want to meet characters and feel the magic, which makes a new gate a much easier and cheaper prospect to build - One signature ride, a couple of off-the-shelf kiddie coasters, a fancy restaurant or two and a ton of character meets and boom, there's an extra gate for very little effort, but huge potential for guest attendance and profit. Make it 'boutique' branded with super high ticket prices, and unlimited fastpass for resort guests, and they'll be laughing. Might even make a sixth gate while they're at it.
If statistics show across the board people are reducing their visit by a day, I could see a cheap and small fifth gate springing up very quickly, with just enough to get that missing day back. There's no need to expand or improve any of the other parks first - the guests come anyway to those, and if crowds drop just add a festival overlay (Star Wars Weekend, Food & Wine etc.) to keep things buoyant.
And what quicker way to kill the competition? Yes the new gates may be half-hearted, but they will still take that valuable vacation time away from Sea World and Universal without having to spend much money, and that's what matters at the end of the day.
Not to mention their upcoming lineup:Universal's third gate for sure. Just in the last 5 years, Universal has opened 3 new highly immersive lands (HP x2, Springfield), 3 new E-tickets (HP x2, Transformers), 4 other new attractions (Hogwarts Express, Ollivanders x2, Kang and Kodos, Raptor Encounter), a mini golf course, revamped 3 other attractions (Dragon Challenge, Hippogriff, Minions) and gave Spiderman a facelift. That's 14 new experiences, with at least the Kong E-ticket/mini-land and Volcano Bay water park in the cannon for the next 2 years.
Meanwhile, the Mouse has given us an expanded Fantasyland with 3 new attractions, and a facelift on Test Track. 5 new experiences, spread twice as thin. The last true E-ticket that WDW produced was Everest in 2006 - 9 years ago!
In short, Universal's third gate is way sooner because they will continue expand and impress. Disney will continue to coast, because they can and still make boatloads of money.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.