KingStefan
Well-Known Member
OK, here we go, yet another FP like it or hate it thread.
If properly implemented (right number of passes distributed for each time period - CMs allow the right ratio of guests (FP to Standby), etc.) then in the aggregate it does NOT make the Standby lines longer. Or shorter. But it has to be implemented properly, and requires constant tuning and CM training, which I believe does not always happen.
It's queueing theory implemented, and it works well most of the time. I was there in the 70s, when there was limited E-tickets, no FP, and smaller crowds, and the lines as I remember them were longer. On some days MUCH longer. Now, I don't have statistics (although if anyone does, I'd be interested to see them), so I can't say for sure.
I personally love the FP system. I really could not live without it.
If properly implemented (right number of passes distributed for each time period - CMs allow the right ratio of guests (FP to Standby), etc.) then in the aggregate it does NOT make the Standby lines longer. Or shorter. But it has to be implemented properly, and requires constant tuning and CM training, which I believe does not always happen.
It's queueing theory implemented, and it works well most of the time. I was there in the 70s, when there was limited E-tickets, no FP, and smaller crowds, and the lines as I remember them were longer. On some days MUCH longer. Now, I don't have statistics (although if anyone does, I'd be interested to see them), so I can't say for sure.
I personally love the FP system. I really could not live without it.