What impact do you think it would have on Disney?
Even Walt did not hold the official titles of corporate leadership.The last creative person to run the company was Walt Disney.
Even Walt did not hold the official titles of corporate leadership.
Rhode is great at what he does, and what he does is nothing at all related to running a global entertainment conglomerate.
Even then, Joe’s experience and expertise are in design and not operations.I guess what I should have said the park operation only not the entire corporation.
Iger dictating that Disney will not finance attractions that do not support franchises is a stifling of creativity and a removal of creatives from control. He has also continued to place people with little to no prior experience in charge of Walt Disney Parks and Resorts.The problem with Disney isn't that creatives aren't in control, or are stifled.
Iger has everywhere put creatives in control of their departments, gives them a free hand, and signs any cheque they request of him as long as they deliver.
As for Joe, he hasn't fixed the Yeti but did build Pandora, replaced ToT with Guardians and destroys an EPCOT original for a superhero thrill ride.
Yes, Joe always struck me too as more of a DC man...Iger dictating that Disney will not finance attractions that do not support franchises is a stifling of creativity and a removal of creatives from control. He has also continued to place people with little to no prior experience in charge of Walt Disney Parks and Resorts.
The decision to build Pandora was made without input from Rohde and he doesn’t exactly come across as a Marvel fan boy.
While Iger may not often impose the sort of direct creative input that Eisner was know for, the franchise mandate is a big creative limitation. The criteria is not the best story and experience, but the best box office permance.Yes, Joe always struck me too as more of a DC man...
All kidding aside, control does not mean independence. More, autonomy and a hands-off approach. Iger has no creative ambition, unlike his predecessor. Iger does realise he runs a creative enterprise and tries to create the conditions for creatives to bloom.
The running of the parks Iger seems to consider less a creative endeavor than an operational one, this might be a mistake. Akin to letting the creative direction of a movie be decided by the movie producer rather than the director.Also, I don't really know what I am talking about and handn't noticed anybody who does had already posted in this thread and
Reading some of the posts, no one seems to know who can be put in charge to get the old Disney magic back?
If anything I think today's Disney is just too big for any one person to run successfully.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.