In the past, I had brought up why so many people here think that Frozen Ever After is thematically inappropriate for EPCOT (i.e., a fictitious realm in a pavilion otherwise all about a real country), that it should have gone in, say, Fantasyland or maybe even the Studios (because it's a movie, so anything goes in the Studio). While they do bring up a point, I don't think it's really that bad a fit. They did research, and even the name "Arendelle" is based on a real Norwegian location. So you can't say they didn't try to fit it in.
In the same thread, I had also brought that there have actually been many other thematic inconsistencies in the park, yet most of them seem to get overlooked or get a free pass. One of them is the question of how the Little Mermaid ride fits in the California Adventure. Where are the criticisms based on that? About the only connection to California that "The Little Mermaid", a European story, has is that it was made entirely in Southern California. I could be mistaken, but I don't believe the animators ever went to Denmark or anywhere to do research on the movie.
Yet many people here seem to be less bothered by that ride being in the CA Adventure than Frozen Ever After being in EPCOT. How is it that the Little Mermaid in the CA Adventure gets a free pass, while Frozen Ever After in EPCOT does not?
