willtravel
Well-Known Member
I have often wondered what the original Imagineers who built WDW would think of the changes in WDW now and the changes coming in the future for all the WDW parks?
The second episode of The Imagineering Story takes a good back-handed swipe at Magic Kingdom for "playing it safe, at least creatively".
Most of the discussion of Magic Kingdom's merits revolves around the engineering hurdle of turning virgin swamp land into a functioning city and the utilitdors and such, which is significant, but I feel like the creative flourishes and added details get ignored because the park is usually written off as just another Disneyland, even within the company.
The Magic Kingdom was designed by WED's A-team with all the knowledge and skills that had been developed through 10+ years of operation in California and the World's Fair. The goal was to take the premise of "another amusement park in Florida" and make it better, not just in terms of operations, but visually as well. And by 1970s standards, they succeeded beautifully (even if Rolly Crump doesn't agree).
The Magic Kingdom was a great park. It still deserves to be treated as such. This is why I get so grumpy over what I feel has been the mistreatment and indifference towards it by both Disney and its fans. It was never just about characters, stroller parking or rides for little kids, it was about creating a romantic dreamscape on a larger, more beautiful scale than Disneyland could ever be.
The experiences should be for a wide audience, the effects should work, the queues should be clean, the technology should be updated, new additions should truly add, not take away from the land's designs, the restaurants should serve decent food, the entertainment should be as varied as the attractions, the shops should sell more than just junk. I like to think it's the most popular Disney park because there is something of merit inside. Maybe if the company stopped treating it like a tourist trap, so would the customers and employees.
Such a gem of thread. Reread it all. Thanks Animaniac and keep it coming! Your love and understanding of the MK is palpable.
You are absolutely right, it used to be waiting in line to ride and the walk out when finished were an experience in themselves.Something that popped into my head while thinking about the Florida Space Mountain...
In a way, it's kind of like an EPCOT pavilion. It has that kind of scale to it, despite just being a "roller coaster", and when RCA sponsored it, there was a real post-show with AAs that was kind of like an attraction of its own. There's also those long hallways, the moving ramp at the end and the way the seperate unload area feels like a lounge or pre-show room on its own. It's still unique in that way. The 1975 and 1983 versions also had a consistent score to them, with '83 having the very EPCOT-like theme song "We've Come So Far".
The California mountain in comparison feels so much smaller, not just because it literally is (and sunk into the ground...and bordered on most sides by other buildings), but because everything from the tighter indoor queue to breaking the chainlift into thirds (and having it seperated from the rest of the track) makes the overall experience a lesser one. There it's just another ride. It's not a defining part of the park's identity or landscape in the way you see it from the monorail or Contemporary parking lot at WDW.
Space [Discovery] Mountain in Paris is way more intense as a coaster, and beautiful in its own way, but I think Florida still has the best designed version of the ride to date. Too bad it's the worst maintained.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.