Buzz Lightyear
Member
Who first grabbed that eagle shot on the weatherbug cam?? Is that a hoax!? It's like a one in a million shot... quite magical!
I grabbed it off of a time lapse sequence last year. Not a hoax at all, just lucky I guess.
Who first grabbed that eagle shot on the weatherbug cam?? Is that a hoax!? It's like a one in a million shot... quite magical!
I remember that from the "Wand Removal" thread- great pic!I grabbed it off of a time lapse sequence last year. Not a hoax at all, just lucky I guess.
I remember that from the "Wand Removal" thread- great pic!
I couldn't see what the security issue would be... If it's an issue of people plotting to break in, you can find better blueprints online, and hear about all sorts of chinks in the armour... For crying out loud you can get satellite mapping of the entire area that is more defined than what the webcam gives. A terrorist plot security issue, please, anything that happens at Disney World is going to be photographed and released so quickly by avid fans like us quicker than CNN can say "Wolf Blitzer"... So they couldn't possibly keep a major accident/attack quiet for long.
I can't find a valid reason for them not to put it back up...
Who first grabbed that eagle shot on the weatherbug cam?? Is that a hoax!? It's like a one in a million shot... quite magical!
Knee-jerk reaction to 911.
Cameras were down before 9/11.
:shrug:
I really don't see a good reason for them to be up and running though.
Thats correct. There are no advantages to running the cameras, only disadvantages. Those I've covered, the 'terrorist' angle is something else entirely. I suppose a 'terrorist' could look at the cameras and see there were thousands of people in the park, but they could just wait outside the gates and see the same thing.
...There are no advantages to running the cameras, only disadvantages...
Further, you can do the same as the situation you presented by loading up the WDW site with a lot more pictures.
That might be the angle that you want to take, but that is not the realistic angle. The way you are viewing it doesn't take into account the many disadvantages that have been mentioned.
Further, you can do the same as the situation you presented by loading up the WDW site with a lot more pictures.
I'm sorry... I'm having a problem finding all of the many disadvantages that have been mentioned.... There was one mentioned about security by unkadoug, but you yourself have nixed that one one already... and the one about the wall street people keeping tabs on how busy the park is (even after it was solved in the OP by me)...
If you could quote the other disadvantages you've seen already posted in this very post that would be great....
As a side note Kamikaze: It does seem that you are mostly trying to be argumentative in this post and I would like to discourage you from doing so... it's not very productive... If you are taking issue with me, I would invite you to do drop me a PM and we discuss this like rational adults...
Making the shot so it doesn't show people is not a solution. It may be what you would like, but just because you want it that way doesn't make it a solution. All you would be doing is possibly delaying until you have the problem again.
For instance, heres a thought: Camera is on top of the train station facing Cindy's Castle. Cannot see Main Street, so no guests. Good so far, right? What if its pouring rain? Someone logs on and takes a look and goes 'I don't want to go there if it rains!' and doesn't book because of it. Don't say that doesn't happen, the vast majority of the world are morons. Now, the flipside to that is Disney just hosting a few great pictures of bright sunny skies. Which do you think would be more effective?
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.