Because 1) there's a Disneyland Today account that serves the same role and 2) nobody cares about podcasts. 99% of WDW guests have no idea there's a Wdw today podcast and neither do they care.
Because 1) there's a Disneyland Today account that serves the same role and 2) nobody cares about podcasts. 99% of WDW guests have no idea there's a Wdw today podcast and neither do they care.
I'm one of those 99% who had no idea there was a WDW Today Podcast. So the Twitter account name they came up with totally makes sense to me.
Nobody cares about podcasts? Are you serious?
33% of all Americans have listened to at least one podcast.
17% of all Americans have listened to a podcast in the last month.
http://www.journalism.org/2015/04/29/podcasting-fact-sheet/
Also,
"99% of WDW guests have no idea there's a Wdw today podcast and neither do they care."
Well, many of them are about to learn about it because WDW picked a less-than-great Twitter handle for their new service.
That data is too vague to make a point. Many of the 17% of Americans who have listened to a podcast in the last month are probably listening to the same, mainstream podcast (think Serial or Welcome to Nightvale), or a super niche podcast that doesn't get much visibility. WDWToday falls into the niche category, and an average WDW guest who sees it isn't likely to think,"Hm, here's a cool podcast that I've never heard of. Maybe I'll give it a listen." Not after simply seeing a Twitter handle.
Perhaps he should have said 2 out of 3 Americans do not care about podcast and over 4 out of 5 haven't listen to one in the past month?Nobody cares about podcasts? Are you serious?
33% of all Americans have listened to at least one podcast.
17% of all Americans have listened to a podcast in the last month.
http://www.journalism.org/2015/04/29/podcasting-fact-sheet/
Also,
"99% of WDW guests have no idea there's a Wdw today podcast and neither do they care."
Well, many of them are about to learn about it because WDW picked a less-than-great Twitter handle for their new service.
Perhaps he should have said 2 out of 3 Americans do not care about podcast and over 4 out of 5 haven't listen to one in the past month?
Furthermore he could have also said that the entire Twitter following of @WDWTodayPodcast is about 1.5% of the main Walt Disney World Twitter handle. Or, just for icing, noted that @WDWToday has amassed a third of the number of followers in two weeks that @WDWTodayPodcast has managed in 6 years.
You know...if we're going to use numbers and all that...
I guess I'm one of those weird ones since I have never listened to a single podcast, and have zero desire to do so.
Nobody cares about podcasts? Are you serious?
33% of all Americans have listened to at least one podcast.
17% of all Americans have listened to a podcast in the last month.
http://www.journalism.org/2015/04/29/podcasting-fact-sheet/
Also,
"99% of WDW guests have no idea there's a Wdw today podcast and neither do they care."
Well, many of them are about to learn about it because WDW picked a less-than-great Twitter handle for their new service.
Nope. I make up my own mind by reading and research. I don't have to have someone else tell me what to think.Have you ever listened to NPR? Or any sort of talk radio?
Nobody cares about podcasts, yes
Nope. I make up my own mind by reading and research. I don't have to have someone else tell me what to think.
Certainly not all of them. Some are just for entertainment. Some to pass along news. We would just rather read myself. Oh, and we don't read via Kindle or Nook or any other method. We read books. We have hundreds in our collection. We are very old school in that regard.Is that what you think podcasts are? People trying to brainwash you in to thinking a certain way?
Certainly not all of them. Some are just for entertainment. Some to pass along news. We would just rather read myself. Oh, and we don't read via Kindle or Nook or any other method. We read books. We have hundreds in our collection. We are very old school in that regard.
It's just not something that we are into.
Sorry. When I talk about reading books, that is mostly for entertainment purposes. Clive Cussler, Stephen King, David Baldacci, Iris Johansen, and Patricia Cornwell are some of our favorites. Books that people write (well, except for Marty Sklar and a few Imagineers!) I avoid, as they are influenced by their point-of-view. I try to look at both sides, and decide for myself. And you are completely correct in that the author doesn't make it any more legitimate. I don't read those, either.I'm kind of chilled by the fact that you have switched to using the pronoun "we".
I'm glad you read. But you are aware that authors can pass along opinion as fact and fact as opinion, right? Just because it is written on paper doesn't make it any more legitimate.
And every time you crack open one of these books, you should thank a Phoenician.
I don't think social media has much to do with it. If anything, social media and the internet in general gives introverted people a way to communicate they would not have had in the past.I shouldn't laugh at this, but its so true. I never really realized it until I began my customer service job. The look of terror people have on their face when I try to strike up a conversation on the sales floor is amazing. Small talk at the cash wrap, forget about it. Like every person in their mid-20s I love social media, but I hate how with each passing day we grown more and more distant from each other.
I don't think social media has much to do with it. If anything, social media and the internet in general gives introverted people a way to communicate they would not have had in the past.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.