eliza61nyc
Well-Known Member
then if we are not that market, why are we even having the comparison??That’s not the point. We are not that resort’s market, but for its market, admission is reasonably priced.
then if we are not that market, why are we even having the comparison??That’s not the point. We are not that resort’s market, but for its market, admission is reasonably priced.
Please tell me how many of the 330 million people in the US are rich? 5% is 16.5 million. 2% would be 6.6 million. Or give me the income level you think the rich begin. That might actually be the better number.
It is not just Disney. Universal gets a free ride on this site because they are smaller. The cost of entry into the themepark business in the US is too high. Cedar Fair and Six Flags are the only ones. Maybe SeaWorld if they merged with Hershey and Herschend. I actually see more mergers in this industry not less. I would love to see AT&T buy back Six Flags and reenter the market. They would take back HP from Universal and could build up a true third competitor. Universal would be fine because they have Nintendo and all the Dreamwork IP now. If Cedar Fair, SeaWorld and Herschend merged they would have the Peanut IP, Sesame Street and animals. I don't want the Chinese to come here and buy one of our regional themepark companies but they may if they get the chance.This is part of the situation- I used to work in an office where there were a fair number of people who made well into the six figures. The problem was, these people thought they were middle class. They only saw the .1% as wealthy or well off, and they spent most of what they made on keeping a certain lifestyle, i.e., buying a sizable home in a gated community, driving a premium car, taking expensive vacations, etc. And yes they could afford it, although just barely, and spent most of what they made, just like lower income or middle class people do, only they spent it on more expensive items.
And there is a good number of people in this category, millions of them in the US alone. And these are the people Disney and other brands who want to be seen as premium brands target (Apple and Lexus also come to mind). And that is because these consumers are the most profitable. They want to be seen using certain brands, and are willing to pay quite a bit to do so. My point is, Disney could probably triple their prices tomorrow, and still keep a lot of these people- in fact they would be seen as even more exclusive and desirable. Disney still has a lot of room to increase prices with this group before they would be seen as only for the wealthy by them. It is unfortunate though, as appealing to this group was not the original intention of building Disneyland or WDW. Maybe someone else will come along to build another brand that is more like the early days of Disney.
There’s an assertion that Disney has to raise prices to keep guests out becuase the parks can’t handle the crowds. TDR tickets are affordable and they figured out that a mixture of dated tickets, which don’t have pricing tiers, and very expensive APs avoid the clogging these price increases are meant to “stop”.then if we are not that market, why are we even having the comparison??
You are proving the point. In Japan, Hong Kong and other parks they dont get the crowds so Disney charges less. Do you really think if their parks were suffering from gridlock that they wouldn't raise their ticket prices? Ticket prices are based on supply and demand.There’s an assertion that Disney has to raise prices to keep guests out becuase the parks can’t handle the crowds. TDR tickets are affordable and they figured out that a mixture of dated tickets, which don’t have pricing tiers, and very expensive APs avoid the clogging these price increases are meant to “stop”.
And the holiday events are included with park admission.
You have an excellent point. It is the total cost of the vacation that counts. Prices of individual tickets are one part, but only one part. Family size is a major part because if the average size of the family used to be 6 and us now 3, parents have more to spend on a per person basis. Flying is actually still cheaper today than it was in the 1970s. Doubling ticket prices would actually cost the same amount of money. Food could go up substantially but doubling would actually cost more because children eat less. As for rooms, maybe they used 2 before and could use one but let's assume they used one before and one now so any increase in cost would add to the price. But if they saved 600 in airline fares it would make up for doubling the rates. (Figuring 100 a ticket each way per airline ticket)Another thing to consider is that its not just Disney or theme parks that are raising prices. I have a friend that use to scoff at the price of taking a family to Disney till she priced it in comparison to taking them to Yellowstone for the same amount of time. Disney actually came in cheaper and that's where they are going for their vacation.
My parents didn't mind telling us they could not afford a WDW trip when I was growing up. They already paid for the yacht club so we had the pool and sailing. We lived on the Jersey Shore and had the beach everyday in the Summer. Looking back I see we were in the upper middle class but even then WDW was for the rich or those with the same money my parents had but spending it on a weeks vacation rather than something there kids could enjoy year round. We also has Great Adventures Annual Passes since it opened.
Disney was never for the masses. It is a lie that gets passed along by those who don't want to admit they came from families that were rich or were lucky to live near a Disney park.
Mistyped meant --many-- no gender implications ment
Nope, TDL and TDS (3rd and 5th in WW attendence in 2017) see more guests on a per park basis than the non MK parks. And as @Animaniac93-98 pointed out UNI Osaka (4th WW), which is UNI’s most popular park, has much lower admission prices than the other UNI parks.You are proving the point. In Japan, Hong Kong and other parks they dont get the crowds so Disney charges less. Do you really think if their parks were suffering from gridlock that they wouldn't raise their ticket prices? Ticket prices are based on supply and demand.
I am glad your Grandmother lived in Florida and you were able to visit her. I hope you look back at those trips and realize the best part was seeing her. However, people like you who did that are not the ones people say are being priced out. I think families should always visit their parents and grandparents every year before wasting money on a WDW vacation. Family is what life is all about.Not this "Disney's never been for the masses" nonsense again... I guess my family was "rich", then, because we went every other year or every third year? We flew from MN and stayed with my grandmother in Sarasota for most of the time we were in FL, with a couple of nights at a Days Inn to do WDW. We were firmly middle class. My dad worked overtime every Saturday to save up enough money for our family of 4 to go every 2-3 years, and I don't ever remember going to the parks more than 3 days at a time until 1991, when there was more to do and you could fill up 4-5 days.
Yesteryear's WDW clientele is most definitely NOT like today's. The proliferation of credit has seen to that. I'm out...
All interesting numbers. Shanghai Disney is about 45 bucks US. And guess what you can fly there for around $650 from the US too.Nope, TDL and TDS (3rd and 5th in WW attendence in 2017) see more guests on a per park basis than the non MK parks. And as @Animaniac93-98 pointed out UNI Osaka (4th WW), which is UNI’s most popular park, has much lower admission prices than the other UNI parks.
From the 2018 TEA/AECOM Report
View attachment 356679
See it's not sad to me. What is sad is that people place ridiculous importance on wdw. WDW is not college tuition, it is not a mortgage so if John q public cannot recognize where a vacation to a fake, playland should fall why should someone feel bad?I understand economics, and I actually think that this has a lot to do with it:
But it is still sad to me, and not because of the crowds: Instead, because of the ridiculous cost it puts on average families, whether they have to save up forever, or especially if they use a credit card to go on something they cannot afford because they see their children getting older and they just know that the value of the experience is something they are willing sacrifice for.
It's just sad that Disney has set the bar so high on price that many reasonable families will no longer be able to do it without doing contortions on their credit.
I understand this completely. Vacations were never in the realm of possibility growing up, Disney might as well have not existed. I didnt grow up traumatized by lack of what is simply a luxury. Kid wants to go to Paris but she knows if she wants that, start saving her money and put herself in a position to do that. What she'll have deserved is the right to spend her money as she see fit nothing else.See it's not sad to me. What is sad is that people place ridiculous importance on wdw. WDW is not college tuition, it is not a mortgage so if John q public cannot recognize where a vacation to a fake, playland should fall why should someone feel bad?
Why is the fake narrative keep going around that every kid "deserves " a wdw vacation.
It is simple, you either can afford it or you cannot. You either think its worth the money or you don't. There have been untold number of times i could not afford stuff.
When did the memo go out that everyone csn afford every thing they want??
If that's the case who do I see about that Audi q8, I've been drolling over?
So you believe that every visitor to WDW is rich?
My parents didn't mind telling us they could not afford a WDW trip when I was growing up. They already paid for the yacht club so we had the pool and sailing.
When MK only serviced 16M guests per year, it was a much more pleasant park. Apples and Oranges.Nope, TDL and TDS (3rd and 5th in WW attendence in 2017) see more guests on a per park basis than the non MK parks. And as @Animaniac93-98 pointed out UNI Osaka (4th WW), which is UNI’s most popular park, has much lower admission prices than the other UNI parks.
From the 2018 TEA/AECOM Report
View attachment 356679
Great Adventure has a real one night camping experience. You have to have a 10x10 foot tent and set it up in their small area in the middle of their safari. Last year it was only 85.30 and included dinner and some minor Entertainment. We enjoyed it and will do it again this year.Americans charge everything these days. And many DON'T pay it all off every month. That's today's reality.
As for trips elsewhere, some of my fondest memories as a child were a roadtrip plus camping when I was a kid. That is certainly still much cheaper than Disney. But in today's world one doesn't merely do camping even if the goal is an outdoors trip. Oh, no, one has to "glamp" rather than camp, and take photos of all the kiddies in their new outdoor clothes that they'll wear once. Even if one hasn't quite saved up for the total cost, there's always that VISA to cover the rest.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.