Mecha Figment
New Member
it's hard to compare the lion king and beauty and the beast's success on film, broadway and theme park shows to each other --- if it stands true that tarzan could've closed because of hill's reasoning, then that would never apply to lion king or batb as they were much popular on film than tarzan ever was.
i sort of understand this point... and this point applies to none of us on this site- let's say you went to wdw a few years ago for possibly the first or second time and watched Tarzan Rocks - then two years down the road you vacation in NY and plan to take in a broadway show - many people might make the assumption that what they saw in WDW would be similar to paying 60-200 bucks a ticket to watch the same thing or same principle show... so they might opt to spend that money on something they've heard great things about, like wicked... i can completely understand where they are coming from with this logic - but don't know how logical it actually is...?
VOTLM would be in the ranks with the lion king and batb, though - not tarzan--- but, imo - batb and voltm at MGM need MAJOR re-working. batb needs an enclosed theater with a new script and stage effects, as votlm needs a new script, new effects and longer show-time (if it sticks around :animwink
*off topic* - did anyone catch SNL tonight with Molly Shannon reprising some of her greatest characters? I KICK, I STRETCH and I KICK - 'cause I'm 50!!!!!!!
Just for the record Volm use to be longer, but the show didn't work well longer. The show that is today is a well refined show due to years of script changes and continual performance changes There were several scenes proposed but from what i understand were cut because they just wouldn't work right.