BrianLo
Well-Known Member
I do think it comes from Wizarding World being such a step up from where Universal were before that people have looked to Disney to make the same kind of step up from where they were.
I am guessing in reality it was Wizarding World that was basically Universal's answer to "step up" to Disney's reputation. It just seems from then Disney hasn't really made the same kind of improvement, and possibly could be viewed as having made a slight step down from their historical reputation.
I don't think reality matters, it is about perception.
It’s definitely this in part. Partly being the myopic Orlando centric viewpoint (Universal chased Disney into China after all and Universal Beijing is poo).
But as you mention it was the sudden shock of how much stronger Hogsmead was than past precedent mixed with New Fantasyland being clearly phoned in. However, DCA redo and New Fantasyland were very much the projects in parallel with original Potter. To mixed results Orlando wise. But arguably it’s aging somewhat better than anticipated.
I’m still sitting out the other end watching Universal run on the fumes of Potter and practically more than half of everything else they’ve done during Iger’s tenure in Orlando is on a short list to be ripped out again. It’s hardly this pristine report card. Meanwhile, their global holdings almost across the board continue to fall further behind Disney’s standards.
For the record, I think there are strong signs Comcast is finally becoming more consistent… but we’ve been saying that for 15 years now.