As a former teacher and wife of a teacher, all I can respectfully say to that is "Walk a mile in their shoes!"I will endeavor to practice what I preach and be respectful of all involved.
When I read the first paragraph of the original post, two thoughts popped into my head before I read any further:
1) It's not insane, it's a great idea.
2) This person is probably a teacher.
WITH RESPECT, I have always found that those who speak the loudest against more weeks of school tend (as a general rule) to be those whose OWN time off would be compromised.
I think there are many reasons why our kids are so far behind most other developed nations in education. I certainly don't think another few days in school could hurt anything.
And again, with respect (and I have several friends who are teachers), most of us don't have jobs that only require us to work for 9 months (less, really, with extended holidays already in place), yet get paid as much or more than those who work year round. Not to mention that two-income households where one parent is off for the summer don't have the child care issues the rest of us might have.
A good teacher is a valuable commodity, but so is a good student. And a good family vacation, no matter how enjoyable, is far less important than a good education.
there is one and one reason ONLY why schools start earlier in the SOUTH and other parts of the country.. FOOTBALL.
As a former teacher and wife of a teacher, all I can respectfully say to that is "Walk a mile in their shoes!"
My DH worked until the 3rd of July since he is a department head, and so far has spent over 100 hours of his "vacation" time working on curriculum changes for next year. The sad part is that the "new" curriculum is basically the curriculum that they used 20 years ago.Yeah, just because I think kids need more school doesn't mean that I think all teachers are a$$-dragging, but there are some who aren't living up to their end of their contract, and plenty others who can't honor their end of the contracts with out of date textbooks, kids who refuse to absorb knowledge, administrations who insist they "teach to the test" instead of making sure students retain what they know, parents who insist evolution is a lie and their kids don't need to learn it, local big business bullies who insist as long as a kid can catch a football he should move on to the next grade, lest his scholarships he hasn't even really earned get jeopardized, etc. I'm married to a teacher and have 3 siblings who are teachers, and oftentimes their most frequent complaint is catching the kids up to all the stuff they were supposed to know by then, but don't. And this is in a supposedly good suburban area, I can't even imagine how badly the kids in poorly funded urban areas have to catch up just to be functionally literate.
there is one and one reason ONLY why schools start earlier in the SOUTH and other parts of the country.. FOOTBALL.
putting the kids into the state-run day care for more time during the summer is not going to fix things...
I don't think that longer or shorter summers are going to help the school situation. My own opinion is that we have too few parents who care--or have the TIME to care. We have turned the schools into a state-run day care and asked them to take over parenting duties while taking away all of their disciplinary power. When you have children who aren't given boundaries at home and CAN'T be given boundaries at school, you end up with a building full of kids who don't behave properly (and some who probably don't even know HOW to behave properly).
In the past, our spending per student was lower, our summers were longer, our teachers paid less, and we didn't have "No Child Left Behind"--yet SOMEHOW we managed to turn out kids who could read, write, and lose a fingernail without needing counselors to help them deal with it. I think the length of vacations is not going to make a bit of difference. The problem is deeper, and putting the kids into the state-run day care for more time during the summer is not going to fix things...
Yuck! Kids need there vacations. Taking them away will make it a bad situation in the schools with stressed out kids.
I will endeavor to practice what I preach and be respectful of all involved.
When I read the first paragraph of the original post, two thoughts popped into my head before I read any further:
1) It's not insane, it's a great idea.
2) This person is probably a teacher.
WITH RESPECT, I have always found that those who speak the loudest against more weeks of school tend (as a general rule) to be those whose OWN time off would be compromised.
I think there are many reasons why our kids are so far behind most other developed nations in education. I certainly don't think another few days in school could hurt anything.
And again, with respect (and I have several friends who are teachers), most of us don't have jobs that only require us to work for 9 months (less, really, with extended holidays already in place), yet get paid as much or more than those who work year round. Not to mention that two-income households where one parent is off for the summer don't have the child care issues the rest of us might have.
A good teacher is a valuable commodity, but so is a good student. And a good family vacation, no matter how enjoyable, is far less important than a good education.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.