PorterRedkey
Well-Known Member
I think Disney is currently running into a big problem, namely: what movie should gets its own attraction?
Huge $$ makers like Frozen already have more than one attraction and that appears to still not be enough.
WIR is proposed to take over SGE in Tomorrowland. It wouldn't be surprising for them to try and make a Zootopia attraction work somewhere...but that's setting a pretty high precedent. Do all "$ucce$$ful" movies from here on out get their own attractions? And what about the still attraction-less movies from the 90s? Aladdin, Lion King, Pocahontas, Hercules, etc...there is the smallest amount of inclusion of them around the parks, and certainly not their own attractions.
So Disney can either just keep up its trend of "new movie, new attraction", but eventually they're gonna run out of available space and have to axe something existing, which opens its own can of worms.
I should have been clear, I ALWAYS prefer an original attraction to one that is IP based (Star War and Indy being the exceptions).
My PotF ride idea was based on Disney and Chappie's obsession with IP's and synergy. I, unfortunately, have excepted the new Chappie reality, even if I am fighting against it. At least as much as one theme park fan can.