Disstevefan1
Well-Known Member
Was this posted here yet?
I wouldn't say that. Just nothing on this scale. it is more of they have to start now in order to complete the timeline and rightfully so, it gets the most attention. It begins with this full general hype reveal confirming the lands.
The Parade, night show and Dreamworks area of studios will be marketing soon. They also don't want to clash too much with all the announcements and reveals for HHN that will be here before you know it.
I guess that’s what I mean. Sometime in the Fall (after HHN launched in August) would have made slightly more marketing sense.
I think the holiday season could be pretty soft for them this year as it is, which is fine, it’s a transient issue.
It does need contextualization that Avatar was announced at the start of the partnership and nothing really had been done or known to Imagineering. It was an executive level partnership announcement. Anything announced for this D23 (for real, not blue sky fodder) should be at least 18-24 months further along and also less prone to strong partner oversight slowing it down… for better and worse!
The easier Uni analogy for Avatar is Super Nintendo World. Which frankly was announced 10 years in advance of Epic Universe and actually truly announced for Florida 9 years in advance. Not a criticism of either really, but WDW really could and should be constructing projects within 18 of today… if they want to of course. Projects that probably are going to align with Luigi’s mansion or the Zelda/Pokémon projects.
My son is 8 and 5-8 was fun for height requirements hitting bigger and bigger things and now he is tall enough for any coaster or ride height requirement out there. Have a blast! (side note, my dad used to he he bled blue and white, WE ARE)
Just commenting to say that this was the last place I would've expected a We Are! chant..April will be our first WDW trip with our son. He's absolutely obsessed with animals so AK will be the highlight. He's tall enough for most everything WDW has to offer, but there could be a fear factor of some things. A couple more years and Universal will be a trip on its own and I can't wait.
Penn State!
....
But those who say that it's OK if it has two disjointed settings should also give a pass to other parks when they also have disjointed settings in one 'themed land.'
I don’t think they care as much as we think they do. Pretty sure they knew what was coming and what EU was going to look like. Disney will probably announce something for WDW this year at the Expo just enough to satisfy those who think WDW needs something new because of EU.
Strange none of the Moana JoW splash pad crew have started gloating about Astronimica splash pad.
This is getting off topic, but that is PR tripe. It only works if you keep looking left as you walk down Frontierland and don't look inside past any of the facades as you ignore that a Mississippi Riverboat is constantly with you breaking any sort of geographical or chronological progression for anyone who knows history or geography. "Several different design motifs" is code for "an amalgam of loosely related stuff." Made worse by the addition of Splash.There was an order to it. But don't take my word for it, how about from the Imagineers? From 'The Imagineering Field Guide to the Magic Kingdom':
View attachment 765925
Looks good! It's not going to sway our Orlando vacation plans (Disney will always come first) but I'm excited to check out something actually new in town next year.
To me, that part in bold was my major takeaway, too....
We get three major dark rides(I see this as someone who is not a fan of the Mario Kart Ride) three major coasters and a list of supporting attractions and shows of various scale. I think it is a solid start to a brand new park, that more specifically, expands the resort. I think that is what makes it a Disney slayer in a business sense in terms of what is offered. Even in the announcement, I found it interesting that it was in script to say that this makes Universal Orlando a week long oriented destination.
I can see this working for them longterm and tend to believe the market is able to grow to support a significant amount of people staying and spending most of their time at Universal and another group doing the same at WDW.To me, that part in bold was my major takeaway, too.
There's been debate here back and forth if this gate would make Universal a full tourist destination in and of itself and this line jumped right out at me - Universal is making it crystal clear that's how they see themselves with this expansion.
I don't think they've ever really pretended to be anything more than an add-on or part of a combination of experiences in the Central Florida area before now but I don't believe that line was a mistake - they plan to present themselves as not just an add-on but clearly as an alternative option to Disney in the years to come.
While I don't see them dethroning Disney anytime in the foreseeable future, this could be enough to threaten Disney's current way of doing business in Florida.
... and that could really suck for TDO and all the other parts of the company relying on the wild profits delivered from the "experiences" division but it'd be a great for fans of either/both resorts.
Just commenting to say that this was the last place I would've expected a We Are! chant..
Thank You!
...
You're Welcome!
That's a lovely memory.Not to derail it but I had to start one after seeing the user's pride. My dad and I went to central FL theme parks together from my birth to young adulthood, and he passed away. He was from PA originally and always wore his hat and struck up conversations when appropriate. I love that you see so much when I see it in the theme parks becuase it keeps me feeling like he is around, he left me that one.
I'm less convinced by the model of multiple more or less interchangeable theme parks as a basis for a week-long vacation destination. Disney is lucky because before they moved in that direction the company built parks like Epcot and DAK that worked their way into the popular imagination in their own right, even if they're increasingly converging in practice under the IP mandate. They also used to build themed resorts that were a destination in their own right.
Very interesting .. as for Disney I prefer the use to approach, I really think the creation of new theme park's building like that ended due to the economical downfall of Euro Disney upon opening... hence parks like Westcot, Disney America's, DisneySea(US) version etc Disney's Grand Californian may be the last most thematic deluxe resort in that Disney style of the 90s!For Universal, I just wonder how much the pitch of Epic Universe in addition to Islands of Adventure is going to change how people see Universal as a more complete resort experience rather than just understanding it as new things to see.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.