BrianLo
Well-Known Member
This thread: Rating EU on a scale of one to ten.
Only you're not allowed to use the numbers two through nine.
11!
This thread: Rating EU on a scale of one to ten.
Only you're not allowed to use the numbers two through nine.
I love how vicious this thread has been. Absolutely wild takes on both sides but more than anything, everyone is way too obsessed with being definite and “objective”. There are no correct opinions!!This thread: Rating EU on a scale of one to ten.
Only you're not allowed to use the numbers two through nine.
This is the thing: it seems to be a great park that has been successful, albeit with some issues around capacity and reliability. Epic also seems to have been a bit of a godsend for the Orlando theme park market during a difficult summer, though attendance has been intentionally limited due to the aforementioned issues.This thread: Rating EU on a scale of one to ten.
Only you're not allowed to use the numbers two through nine.
Not really sure of any notable show quality lapses, but in terms of effect reliability in general…word on the street is that Universal is already severely lacking in the upkeep of the show quality (not that Disney wouldn't also do this...)
I think part of the problem is there’s elements of truth to both of those takes, but not even just elements of truth, they also vary on a day-to-day, attendance-to-attendance, and guest-to-guest level before even factoring in desires, expectations, or biases.I'm not sure why that has to spin off into either the park is a guest satisfaction nightmare or the greatest achievement in themed entertainment since Tokyo DisneySea.
I also have the critique with this just being a bunch of random IP hodgepodged together with the loosest story imaginable. There is no combination with them, no flow.
I like the transitions of the Space-themed toys, transition with rocks/cave then you see Galaxy's Edge but I also don't mind it as much because HS is Disney's only park with actual single-IP lands (other than AK's Pandora but that makes sense to me as AK's park structure is sent around the locations, not necessarily IP or not) . While Universal does it very inconsistently and in a way that any of their parks feel kinda sameish. Can you meaningfully tell the difference between what makes Isle of Berk fit Island of Adventure, or any of the other lands? I feel like the parks are all basically the same at this point and thats not great. I like how Disney does it with each park having a different theme and focus, while the lands reflect that.Do you take issue with Toy Story Land right next to Galaxy Edge? How about Hogsmeade and Jurassic Park touching each other.
Random IP stuffed in a park is how Universal and Disney play. We have to expect this by now.
Animal Kingdom says hello.I've said it like twice? maybe this is the third time maximum. Also what Disney has done definitely gets people excited as guest satisfaction has shown. Universal has done some great things but they lack the foresight imo to be a serious contender.
2 of their 3 parks have MAJOR issues with weather which is ridiculous in Florida. The reason that they did that is because outdoor rides are cheap. They cheaped out on the construction and gave the guest a fundamentally worse off experience, full stop. Outside rides can be great to add kinetics, WHEN BALANCED with a respectable amount of capacity that doesn't go down in the rain. Look at Tomorrowland for an example, Astro Orbiter and the Speedway go down but Tron, Space Mountain, Buzz, Carousel of Progress, and People Mover are usually allowed to be open for rain. Rain shuts down all of Isle of Berk except the show, all of Mario except the Mario Kart, and 1/2 of the rides in both Monsters and Celestial Park. TSL, Pandora, Galaxy's Edge, and even Tropical Americas or Monsters do not have these problems. Meanwhile even at Universal's best park (IOA), Jurassic World, Harry Potter, Marvel, Dr Seuss, and Marvel have atleast half of their attractiosn down the second it rains in FLORIDA. There is no excuse to keep making the same mistake and it has definitely led to guest frustration.
This wouldn't be AS bad if there were some serious capacity issues but other than Monsters, most rides capacity is not where it should be as the park was so focused on being different and the next step, it abandons a lot of very high capacity and conventional ride systems. Boat rides and omnimovers are built to be amazing for capacity and can get more people to the fun quicker. I wonder why Universal didn't want ride times to be reasonable unless perhaps to incentivize their overpriced fastpasses of course. Something this big should be able to hold more guests than AK or HS but fails at that.
The park is missing a ton of shade because it was designed with "sweeping vistas" and nice unobstructed views first, which can work when paired with adequate shading/AC. It's stunning theming wise but the seating, shading, and AC are all serious problems.
I also found navigating the park more complicated than it needed to be as you have to enter and exit lands from chokepoints where everyone else is doing the same while a wheel + spoke design imo would have been a much much better option.
I also have the critique with this just being a bunch of random IP hodgepodged together with the loosest story imaginable. There is no combination with them, no flow. These lands could have all been in IOA or UO and made no difference other than improving this parks.
So yeah, I'm not the biggest fan of EU as a park. It's good for what it is and it's a middle tier park for me. I'd rather go to Epcot, AK, MK, over it and depending on the day, HS or IOA.
Especially with the sightlines issues and reports of major animatronics already being broken, I fear this park might end up the ways of Dr Seuss or Jurassic Park, very fast![]()
What about Animal Kingdom?Animal Kingdom says hello.
This is part of the immersion.The park's restrooms and outdoor seating areas were filthy.
And the worst offenders is of course the FrenchThis is part of the immersion.
Do you honestly think Vikings left eating areas spotless after a meal?
Do you think monsters clean after themselves after they go?
All part of the story.
Yep, just don't read these posts if they bother you. It's that simple.lol. Why you mad?
Well ya—-agreed.And to say the truth, no I don't really mind JP and Hogsmeade because that's part of the parts vision, they are still on separate "Island's".
The strict timeline in Galaxy’s Edge was the result of a commitment to immersion. That they picked a lousy time doesn’t negate that.You overrated Galaxy's edge. Making a land time sensitive can be a big mistake for a theme park land, and it was in this case. The fact is Galaxy's Edge takes place in sequels time land and that means no classic Characters for Galaxy's Edge. People want classic Star Wars Characters That also meant gave an excuse why Star Wars Launch Bay existed so long at Animation Courtyard.
Also a lot of people wanted Galaxy's edge to have a planet that already existed in the movies and Disney didn't do that. That is an issue to a lot of people because the Harry Potter theme park lands are based off lands that existed in Harry Potter Movies.
What I'm frustrated by is the tribalism. Making statements that are objectively not true about how "bar-raising" Epic is when it objectively does not raise the bar for the theme park industry.I don't know why you're so flustered by differing opinions on the park, but you really think only two rides in Epic are on Disney's level of "technical prowess?" As if every ride at Disney is a cutting edge E-ticket?
don't disrespect the magic carpets of Aladdin like that
You overrated Galaxy's edge. Making a land time sensitive can be a big mistake for a theme park land, and it was in this case. The fact is Galaxy's Edge takes place in sequels time land and that means no classic Characters for Galaxy's Edge. People want classic Star Wars Characters That also meant gave an excuse why Star Wars Launch Bay existed so long at Animation Courtyard.
Also a lot of people wanted Galaxy's edge to have a planet that already existed in the movies and Disney didn't do that. That is an issue to a lot of people because the Harry Potter theme park lands are based off lands that existed in Harry Potter Movies.
ylol. Why you mad?
I can confirm this. No pre-show on our visit last Thursday and Friday. Also, Igor not working, Wolfman not working, Dracula at the end not working. Overall very disappointed with the ride.
Harry Potter had several effects not working. Umbridge's AA didn't disappear like it's supposed to, so she was on screen and still visible as an AA at the same time. And most of the trial scene did not light up like it's apparently supposed to from the POVs I've watched since returning home.
Hiccup is completely stationary on the coaster.
Several figures not working on Yoshi's Adventure. Several broken figures throughout Super Nintendo World, including the Koopa at the mini-game and the Goomba at that mini-game. The piranha plant mini game is completely broken. Yoshi was not walking around the tree on Mt. Beanpole and the tower of goombas was not moving.
Cranky's mouth is broken in the queue to Mine Cart Madness. The car did not have on-board audio.
The park's restrooms and outdoor seating areas were filthy. I don't think I ever saw a single custodian the entire trip.
The operations were as slow as a Six Flags park. It should not take 40 minutes to reach the load area of Mario Kart after exiting the pre-show. I will not be returning.
Whatever makes Disney look bad!I haven't been there, so take my opinions with as much of a grain of salt as you please, but my impression is that in terms of attractions Epic has a lot going for it. I think where some dissonance arrises for people who are primarily fans of Disney parks is when rollercoasters that pay a lot less attention to immersion within the park let alone a specific land are counted as headliners when if Disney built similar attractions we would all be up in arms.
In general, I do kind of agree with @Tom Morrow's point that all this comparing of the theming with TDS is perhaps overshooting the runway. During construction, all the talk was that this was going to rival TDS in terms of theming and immersion. Then it opened and people started commenting on the issues with sightlines within and outside of the park and the response was borderline mocking about those who were concerned about sightlines as that was just a Disney thing and not something Universal or its fans worried about. Now we're back to Epic being more immersive than any park other than TDS. So, which is it?
Someone could have gone a different day as the poster and had an opposite experience.This is really not a good look for a park that is already struggling with a bunch of issues with capacity, weather shutdowns, operations, etc.
Feels like Universal made it all look great for previews and the grand opening and said "there, we did enough to attract people here, now we don't have to keep trying".
They do that without our help.Whatever makes Disney look bad!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.