• The new WDWMAGIC iOS app is here!
    Stay up to date with the latest Disney news, photos, and discussions right from your iPhone. The app is free to download and gives you quick access to news articles, forums, photo galleries, park hours, weather and Lightning Lane pricing. Learn More
  • Welcome to the WDWMAGIC.COM Forums!
    Please take a look around, and feel free to sign up and join the community.

Universal Epic Universe (South Expansion Complex) - Now Open!

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
Is it internationally beloved? I really don’t know much about it 🤷

I didn’t see the movie until I was an adult and it was a “eh, nice” moment. I didn’t feel particularly inspired by the sets, although the poppies made me snarf.

I’m familiar with the Wicked play, but not the films, because I think Aaron Tveit is fantastic looking and I saw it during his run.

It was fine, catchy, but didn’t particularly make me want to visit Oz.

I realize this is entirely possibly my failing, I just didn’t know there were that many people who wanted to visit Oz badly enough to travel, possibly long distances, to pay to visit a thrill-ride-heavy brand of theme park.
I think Wicked fever may be short lived. Most of us who have seen the musical recognize a problem movie-goers will soon experience: many (most) Broadway shows have a stronger Act 1 and weaker Act 2. No where is that more dramatic than Wicked. All of the iconic songs and the best world-building are in Act 1. Act 2 has very few memorable scenes and the story gets more and more convoluted (and contradictory to the movie it tries to segue into). The result, for many, is that the exuberance you feel at the end of “Defying Gravity” is completely gone 90 minutes later. Wicked is great because of Act 1 and in spite of Act 2.

Making an entire 2-hour movie out of Act 2 was…a choice. I doubt, when all is said and done, people will still be clamoring for a theme park land.

And please don’t even think of picking up the book.
 

BrianLo

Well-Known Member
The result, for many, is that the exuberance you feel at the end of “Defying Gravity” is completely gone 90 minutes later. Wicked is great because of Act 1 and in spite of Act 2.

60 minutes. The second act is 30 minutes shorter. Which I am somewhat fascinated with how they’ll handle the sequel as the reviews roll in.

I am a fan and I do feel the first movie could have left 10 minutes on the cutting room floor to not drag out the songs sooo much. Like you I’ve had my doubts on the strength of the sequel. But since more than half of it needs to be original material they can maybe rescue it.


That aside, there’s plenty of potential for a Wicked land. This is in their set experience thing.

IMG_7276.jpeg




Universal is also short on options, in my opinion. So if not Wicked (and Zelda and Pokemon), what next? Maybe One Piece, albeit another license.
 

Tom Morrow

Well-Known Member
As for opening new attractions/lands Universal is even more creatively bankrupt than Disney——its reliance on IP is off the charts.

How about trying something thematically new and doing it so well that there would be a demand for a movie franchise.

To be fair, reliance on IP has always been Universal's thing. It began as a place where you can "ride the movies". (I know that before that it began as a movie studio tour).

Disney, on the other hand, used to be an even mix of IP experiences and original ones.
 

ToTBellHop

Well-Known Member
To be fair, reliance on IP has always been Universal's thing. It began as a place where you can "ride the movies". (I know that before that it began as a movie studio tour).

Disney, on the other hand, used to be an even mix of IP experiences and original ones.
Yes, but at least when Islands opened, it had attractions not overtly based upon a specific film showcasing specific actors. Unfortunately, that’s been diluted over time. I personally think Lost Continent was more timeless than Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter (and I love Harry Potter).
 

Tom Morrow

Well-Known Member
Yes, but at least when Islands opened, it had attractions not overtly based upon a specific film showcasing specific actors. Unfortunately, that’s been diluted over time. I personally think Lost Continent was more timeless than Daniel Radcliffe as Harry Potter (and I love Harry Potter).

I agree. And the kicker is that Universal has proven that they CAN do original stuff very well, most notably in the form of half or more of the HHN houses each year, and I would argue Darkmoor and Monsters Unchained are more an original creation than a true IP offering.
 

flynnibus

Premium Member
My impressions…

You know it, but it still feels crazy how compact the park is.
Celestial is nicer than it looks online.. it works as a nice area you pass through and the structures are nice looking. I mean you don’t want to go there just for the park… but for atmosphere it’s nice
Berk is by far the most impressive land imo as a theme park land. Harry Potter is realism like mad… but the fantasy stuff in berk is so much fun imo.

The untrainable dragon show just makes you laugh at what Disney tries to put out as stage shows right now.

So many rides had a recurring theme… you get off and say ‘that’s it??’. If I was waiting hour+ I’d be so much more put off

Monsters unchained is insane… but also felt like a demo reel. Like let’s show you everything possible in a quick reel. The figures like Igor are so impressive… everything is dialed to 11… but I still didn’t get like an emotional hook at all with the ride. I loved the castle exterior

Dk mine cart has rough spots but they are confusing like they are shimmy spot that just didn’t need to be there. Almost like construction defects… tho I am sure they are not… but just taking those out would improve it so much. The track effect looked fun.

I was supurised by how much different some was compared to the layout in Hollywood…

MoM is so impressive in how they manage the depth and projection elements… the death eaters look incredible but the human faces still seem lacking. MoM felt like Spider-Man evolved. I don’t think I could justify 3hr waits tho.

I am blessed I hit the park on what is probably the least possible crowd day. I walked on mom, monsters, and most rides. But I don’t think i could tell people with a straight face that visiting and having 90min plus waits everywhere would still be worth it.

If you are 25-35… this park probably screams yes yes yes to you. As an old guy who can’t handle the jerkiness as much anymore my time in these parks is probably closing. And that point will still probably pigeonhole universal… it won’t crack into the multi generational family trip Disney mastered. Epic helps on the low end of the range… but uni is still gonna excel at the young adult demographic and suffer at the edges.

Most shocking thing I wasn’t expecting… how empty all that space around the park is. It’s like in this wasteland of nothing with stuff planted to try to fill it.
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom