ToTBellHop
Well-Known Member
I think Wicked fever may be short lived. Most of us who have seen the musical recognize a problem movie-goers will soon experience: many (most) Broadway shows have a stronger Act 1 and weaker Act 2. No where is that more dramatic than Wicked. All of the iconic songs and the best world-building are in Act 1. Act 2 has very few memorable scenes and the story gets more and more convoluted (and contradictory to the movie it tries to segue into). The result, for many, is that the exuberance you feel at the end of “Defying Gravity” is completely gone 90 minutes later. Wicked is great because of Act 1 and in spite of Act 2.Is it internationally beloved? I really don’t know much about it
I didn’t see the movie until I was an adult and it was a “eh, nice” moment. I didn’t feel particularly inspired by the sets, although the poppies made me snarf.
I’m familiar with the Wicked play, but not the films, because I think Aaron Tveit is fantastic looking and I saw it during his run.
It was fine, catchy, but didn’t particularly make me want to visit Oz.
I realize this is entirely possibly my failing, I just didn’t know there were that many people who wanted to visit Oz badly enough to travel, possibly long distances, to pay to visit a thrill-ride-heavy brand of theme park.
Making an entire 2-hour movie out of Act 2 was…a choice. I doubt, when all is said and done, people will still be clamoring for a theme park land.
And please don’t even think of picking up the book.