Under the Sea ~ Journey of the Little Mermaid closing for month long refurbishment Feb 2-Mar 6

Brer Panther

Well-Known Member
Found this online... Concept art for the ride's "Kiss the Girl" sequence...

Ariels-Adventure_Full_13939.jpg


Notice Flotsam and Jetsam? And here's a drawing of the ride layout:

dca_mermaid_layout.jpg

Perhaps that's a sign that they had plans for a cooler finale.
 

Sped2424

Well-Known Member
DCA's building was purpose-built for the Mermaid ride. The Palace of Fine Arts rotunda was kept from the Golden Dreams days, but the building itself is brand new and was built adjacent to the existing rotunda. The rotunda only serves as an open-air entry way, and serves no practical/structural purpose for the attraction. When the space was used for Golden Dreams, the building only contained the theater, and was completely separate from the rotunda; none of the theater building was retained

The MK building, on the other hand, actually reuses a couple of the walls (north and east side) from the old 20K building. If we're saying that one park had to work with an existing building, MK fits that bill more, though both buildings were essentially new I'm not sure why this was done, but I have to assume it was something related to ease of getting permits for modified structure instead of a completely new one. If you look at the historical images on Google Earth, you can see that the walls stayed there, even after the 20K building was demolished

But more importantly, I think the real trouble is that they decided that both rides needed to be identical, and therefore had to create a design that would fit in both locations. Had each park used a similar-but-unique configuration, I think they could have used the available space more wisely to get some additional scenes in, rather than using the one-size-fits-all approach that we ended up with
Fantasyland+construction2.jpg

Mermaid construction ^

Now you're right about the rotunda, but you're off about our little mermaid attraction using the original walls from 20,000 leagues. Other than the space of which it's show building used to occupy. It's right on top of the old one.
 
Last edited:

Sped2424

Well-Known Member
Found this online... Concept art for the ride's "Kiss the Girl" sequence...

Ariels-Adventure_Full_13939.jpg


Notice Flotsam and Jetsam? And here's a drawing of the ride layout:

dca_mermaid_layout.jpg

Perhaps that's a sign that they had plans for a cooler finale.
They probably did, but the concept art below is of the final ride put it.
 
Last edited:

dstrawn9889

Well-Known Member
Marni--you wrote that misleading... it is not on 20k's foundation. it is in the same footprint area, the old showbuilding (including the foundations) were removed prior to construction
 

dstrawn9889

Well-Known Member
I think he meant it's in the same space or on top of the same area as the old one!
'twas the reason for the correction

do not want anyone to think that the 'second' attraction building to be removed for another attraction building used any previous walls or foundations
 

Biff215

Well-Known Member
When they were building Mermaid, it was speculated that at least a wall may have been salvaged from the old 20k building. This never made any sense to me, but it does seem like you can see this on the Storybook Circus side. This might not be the case, but it was discussed during construction.
 

matt9112

Well-Known Member
That's what I read.


mice-chat is a great source for most rumors to be in one place....as long as you assume it is all rumors you are ok.
its like a vacuum cleaner for rumors...like screamscape is...sucks it all in...the good and the bad.
 

JWG

Well-Known Member
Does anyone have a photo of the door in question? I can't picture it.

I don't have a pic, but if you look at the ride layout above, it's right after load at the top of the u-turn on the far left of the graphic, where the ride path butts up against the wall. It appears it may just be a cover up for access to the ride from the adjoing backstage area.
 

Bing Bong

Well-Known Member
Random question about this version of the ride: Why did they build it with such a high ceiling? California's ceiling matches up with the top of the entrance mural, while Florida's is about twice as high...? I know it's not important but I was just wondering if there was a reason for it.
 

Castle Cake Apologist

Well-Known Member
Fantasyland+construction2.jpg

Mermaid construction ^

Now you're right about the rotunda, but you're off about our little mermaid attraction using the original walls from 20,000 leagues. Other than the space of which it's show building used to occupy. It's right on top of the old one.

Nah, he's right. The walls you're saying he's wrong about are even clearly visible in the picture you've posted.
 

marni1971

Park History nut
Premium Member
'twas the reason for the correction

do not want anyone to think that the 'second' attraction building to be removed for another attraction building used any previous walls or foundations
Sorry....I wasn't clear. Foundation footprint.

Though the footprint was already helpfully prepped and compressed from 35 years of the weight of water and concrete for work on Mermaid to commence.

This should help illustrate the footprint.

image.jpg
 
Last edited:

Clamman73

Well-Known Member
Random question about this version of the ride: Why did they build it with such a high ceiling? California's ceiling matches up with the top of the entrance mural, while Florida's is about twice as high...? I know it's not important but I was just wondering if there was a reason for it.
Maybe just how the whole building fits into the look at DL vs the whole facade/queue of New Fantasyland??? *shrugs*
 

Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.

Back
Top Bottom