I don't understand the point of that. Nothing happened because they didn't want it too. What is so difficult to understand about that. Is there a law that says they have to do something the moment they close something down. They just plain didn't do anything because they just plain didn't want too do anything. It has nothing to do with how long it took to build similar lands, it has everything to do with when they wanted to do something. We can't define a specific time frame as being acceptable or not, and do it with any degree of reality. What exactly is the big deal. They are the ones that stood to lose by delaying any decision and movement, all we did was wait. Do you at home, never delay action on something for whatever reason you may have for delaying it? I'm sorry I just don't understand why when they do something is anything that is owed to us. If we don't agree we simply don't go there. That is the absolute only control we have. If you are a stock holder of significance, you call the board directors and give them hell, otherwise, you have no control at all. Nor is it any of our business how any business is run, if we don't have stock.
And just for the sake of discussion, they didn't close LMA before they began TSL, just not sufficiently for your approval. There is a reason and just because we don't know what it is, doesn't make it invalid.