They could of had individual lap bars but they don't. Alien Enclunter has the bars to keep you stationary etc. You clearly do not get what I am saying, of course a seatbelt won't work for rock n' Rollercoaster. All I am saying is that multiple restraints (that have minimum heights associated with them) can be used for different attractions. The height limit can be increased further, but that's if the restraint won't work for a particular adventure, or if they feel it is not appropriate for a guest of that height. It's not that simple I know, but that is basically what happens. It is not always associated with thrill level, but many times it is. Do you think Soarin' is as thrilling as Tot? Both use Seatbelts, and both have a 40 inch height requirement, but it is for the safety. You can't have a 30 inch kid ride Soarin' as the restraint won't be secure enough, and in a crazy scenario could slip out. And on Tot you could fly up if the seatbelt doesn't fit properly. What an attraction demands is what gets a certain restraint and height requirement associated with it not thrill. It is the actual attraction that decides that, how much it moves etc. Indy has a 44 inch requirement because it is rougher than Dinosaur which has a 40. You can say for a person it is more thrilling, but it was determined not by that but at what height will the restraint will keep you safe. All restraints don't work for every ride, and the height requirement can vary even with the same restraint but in general it is just like sitting in a car's normal chair than riding in a carseat. The seatbelt was designed for a certain height to keep people safe. A lap bar is not necessary in a car, but instead a seatbelt is sufficient, and probably is even safe. They're catered to the specific ride, it is far more than that I know, but that is generally how it works, stop denying it.
Oh my goodness. Of course that is the case, but it is not safe for a 38 inch kid to ride space mountain even though the kid can ride Seven Dwarf's Mine Train. The restraint is not appropriate on space mountain for a 38 inch kid because it would not be secure enough, it would toss the kid around. It would have to be redesigned to allow a kid of that height to ride. It isn't because SM is more thrilling it is simply because of that, and how the attraction itself was designed. A seat belt would not work for that attraction, but a lap bar does, which can be scaled down, but is not always appropriate based on what the ride does, it's movements etc. Again it has very little to do with the thrill, but technically if they want to they could design a restraint that is 40 inches for rock n' rollercoaster, but it would be unsafe as in the case of an emergency the safety brake In some areas would be too rough on a little kid. I get what you're saying, and you're not wrong, but it is much more than just what's appropriate for a kid, it has more to do with the actual track, restraint appropriate for the ride, the height that is safe for the restraint and the ride that was chosen etc.
What do you mean thrill? I don't get what you're saying. I'm not trying to argue. I've told you what I know yet you keep saying thrill and crap like that. You two are right about somethings, but then deny somethings, so I am agreeing with you on somethings. It's not a matter of white and gray. Stop trying to argue for the sake of it.
38 or 40 for Slink. Surely low (if there is one) for aliens.
You are the only person who keeps talking about thrill. "How much [an attraction] moves etc." is its intensity. That is where you are right. You completely veer off course into contradiction by your repeated refusal to consider why a "[restraint] is designed for a certain height." That why is the far more than you know but you keep adamantly insisting those reasons cannot be true. The end result is that you keep putting the cart before the horse.
The aliens is supposed to be the same ride system as maters, which has a height requirement of 32 inches.
Most two year olds are 32" tall.
Yep. To me, "family" ride does not require that infants can ride. Tomorrowland Speedway is a family ride with a 32" requirement. RnRC is arguably not a family ride. Dragon Challenge certainly isn't.
Like i said "To me".
I too had hoped for this exact thing, then had my hopes dashed when they announced TSL. Severely missed opportunities in this park. They even could have kept a studios theme this way (the reason that I adore this park) and kept the single IP lands at bay.
Late 2018- early 2019 I believe
2018 last I heard
