216bruce
Well-Known Member
Because THIS for so, so much on these boards with regard to the parks. The vast majority of folks that visit the parks go there with the desire to see characters, experience what in their minds is "Disney" and see what is popular and to escape from reality. Times change and, like it or not, we aren't the majority. And thanks to the OP for starting a thread on this subject that, hopefully, won't devolve into all the snarkiness of the "other" thread.Yeah, I don't think the majority on this board represents the majority of WDW visitors.
As far as characters in EPCOT go...they shouldn't be the focus of any pavilion but using them in small amounts is fine- like in The Land, character M&G's in WS, etc., is fine. You CAN have an EPCOT with it's original mission and use the characters (when they fit perfectly and in a small dose) to enhance the information presented about tech and science- just like VonDrake did on the old Sunday show or as someone who kids can see as carriers of culture or a 'message' like the old Pocahantas show at AK. Maybe Mary Poppins or Alice telling stories from the UK, etc.
If there was a robotics pavilion, having Hiro act as a presenter with a Baymax presence would be fine, as long as there was more than that. The Seas is the poster child of too much character and not enough substance. It used to be so much more than it is now with diving exhibits, more animals in the aquarium, the illusion of Sea Base Alpha, etc. It's horrible now and is all toons. There is, I'm sure, a happy medium in all of this.
Last edited: