This is obviously not what a lot of us were expecting. We probably all thought it would stick to the movie. Instead, it highlights aspirational moments from the movie. It is *not* a book report ride.
I suppose we could have a debate on a what defines a 'book report ride', but 'highlighting aspirational moments from the movie' would be something I would include as an example of one. If they did it outside the scope of the existing story of the film, perhaps.. but here, they've literally plucked the sequences whole-cloth from the film and shoehorned the viewers into the scene. In the same running order and length. With the same exact story. All they've done is edited out secondary characters and sub-plots for length.
The original B&tB animated film is of course a musical, and a very good one at that. It moves the story along almost entirely through the songs. If you remove any one individual number, you remove a huge chunk of the narrative of the story.
That's ok if you're calling it a book report, because you're already assuming the audience knows the story and doesn't have to be told everything. If you drop someone that's somehow never seen B&tB before into this attraction, the story is now a train wreck because all there is are these... 'moments', some of which like "Something There" go into all this messy character development that we simply don't even know where it's coming from in the context of the ride or why it matters (because it doesn't!).
"Be Our Guest" succeeds most easily because it was already structured as a sequence that skillfully broke the 4th wall in the film and brought the audience into the environment. That, and the ballroom, are places where we do want to spend some time... I'll grant you. But there is no attempt at story in the ride to help us along in that medium. There's no attempt at letting these moments thrive as aspirational ones that we can truly live and explore the world we're placed in. We're stuck in the timeline from the film, beat by beat, swaying along with everything we already know.
A ride is not a film is not a ride. Even if they are in the same world, and telling the same basic story, they need to go about it in different ways. I feel like this ride breaks "Theme park design 101" story rules... and that's something WDI should certainly know since they wrote them in the first place!
Yes, the fit and finish and details and lighting and spaces are legendary, as well we would expect from tons of Tokyo money... but all that's worthless without a reason.