No worries, no combativness coming through at all! I just would have preferred something more WDW specific, like castle artwork or concept art from when the MK was being designed, showing how the castle was to look as the icon of the park. That would have celebrated Cinderella Castle in, I feel, a more WDW centric way for the 50th than Mary Blair’s artwork for the film of the Disney version of the Cinderella story.
Here’s early concept art of the MK. I think it would have been great if the banners showed some of this castle artwork and WDW history, perhaps alongside and complementing Blair’s drawings.
Walt Disney Imagineering and WED concept art and concept models of The Magic Kingdom in Walt Disney World.
www.retrowdw.com
I (think I) get what you and others are saying, that showing concept art for the film is a way of celebrating Cinderella, whose castle is at MK/WDW, which is the main icon of MK/WDW, and that’s how it all ties into the 50th, because celebrating the film is also celebrating the castle and thus celebrating WDW. I’m not necessarily disagreeing, only saying that I believe that approach isn’t as WDW focused as it could be.
It’s a subtle difference, but in an anniversary celebration that seems to have very little in the way of WDW history (
@Sir_Cliff nailed it in their post about the lack of nostalgia for this celebration), these banners were another instance to me where they could have featured a more WDW focused approach but went a different direction instead.