News The Walt Disney Company Annual Meeting Of Shareholders 2025

[MisterPenguin]

Bob your not expanding the parks all your doing is removing and replacing

Land that was once not used for attractions but now is, or will be soon...

• Ratatouille and its plaza
• TRON
• Villains' Land and its two rides
• Encanto's ride building
• Monstropolis ride
• Cosmic Rewind gravity building
• Journey of Water

Not to mention going back a few more years:

• Soarin's' second theater
• Space 220
• Frozen Summerhaus
• Toy Story Land
• Star Wars Land
• Starcruiser (RIP)

 

[Ayla]

Land that was once not used for attractions but now is, or will be soon...

• Ratatouille and its plaza
• TRON
• Villains' Land and its two rides
• Encanto's ride building
• Monstropolis ride
• Cosmic Rewind gravity building
• Journey of Water

Not to mention going back a few more years:

• Soarin's' second theater
• Space 220
• Frozen Summerhaus
• Toy Story Land
• Star Wars Land
• Starcruiser (RIP)

Now, make a list of everything that has closed in the same time frame.

 

[MisterPenguin]

Now, make a list of everything that has closed in the same time frame.

No.

The point I was responding to was that the WDW have not grown in capacity (nor will be growing in the future). Which is false.

But all you have to do is look to see where attractions are now that used to be back of house or fewer attractions.

The **footprint** has expanded. That's extra capacity.

The opposite is footprint within the parks in which an attraction has been taken away **and not replaced.**

That would be attraction building sitting idle. So... Stitch and WoL.

Yes, there has been "removed and replaced," but that doesn't exclude "new footprint and capacity" from also taking place. It's not either/or.

 

[Ayla]

No.

The point I was responding to was that the WDW have not grown in capacity (nor will be growing in the future). Which is false.

But all you have to do is look to see where attractions are now that used to be back of house or fewer attractions.

The **footprint** has expanded. That's extra capacity.

The opposite is footprint within the parks in which an attraction has been taken away **and not replaced.**

That would be attraction building sitting idle. So... Stitch and WoL.

Yes, there has been "removed and replaced," but that doesn't exclude "new footprint and capacity" from also taking place. It's not either/or.

You're confusing space with capacity. Just because there is more land taken doesn't mean there is added capacity.

 

[JD80]

You're confusing space with capacity. Just because there is more land taken doesn't mean there is added capacity.

Sometimes I think some people confuse theoretical capacity to actual capacity.

 

[MisterPenguin]

You're confusing space with capacity. Just because there is more land taken doesn't mean there is added capacity.

True, but the examples I gave resulted in (or will result in) more capacity.

 

[TrainsOfDisney]

Sometimes I think some people confuse theoretical capacity to actual capacity.

Like universe of energy to cosmic rewind for example?