Last edited:
Yes...I was very close to "abolishing" the amendment...but I decided to let it run its course in edited form for the rest of the comp this year. It is a flawed decision and an oversight. We still might abolish it. It was an idea I had been fostering for a while and I threw it in last minute. But to be frank, you and Mickey could have easily switched places in the rankings with further deliberation from the judges, but we kept our decision quick and concise. Either way, you have lost...First, I don't like the addition of a blanket immunity "idol" partially through a challenge (rather, it should have been stated as an objective prior to the challenge...nothing wrong with the addition of it, but for it to be sprung, and grant a LOSING team complete immunity, I take issue with, as you flat out stated...we were 3rd, but due to your personal choice a few days ago...we are here). My suggestion for the future is that the Golden Button can be used, but only confers immunity to a SINGLE player on the team (judges choice). Blanket immunity is not fair to the rest, for a variety of reasons. In a competition like TSI, that makes sense, but with SA? Not so much.
It has its flaws, but I like how you decided to try and out, can't hurt to try something! Though I don't think it would be fair at this point to abolish it since one team already experienced its reward...Yes...I was very close to "abolishing" the amendment...but I decided to let it run its course in edited form for the rest of the comp this year. It is a flawed decision and an oversight. We still might abolish it. It was an idea I had been fostering for a while and I threw it in last minute. But to be frank, you and Mickey could have easily switched places in the rankings with further deliberation from the judges, but we kept our decision quick and concise. Either way, you have lost...
Oh great and powerful Mr. Yensid, I do not question your decision. It is your comp to run as you please (and you know I bow to your authority over it).Yes...I was very close to "abolishing" the amendment...but I decided to let it run its course in edited form for the rest of the comp this year. It is a flawed decision and an oversight. We still might abolish it. It was an idea I had been fostering for a while and I threw it in last minute. But to be frank, you and Mickey could have easily switched places in the rankings with further deliberation from the judges, but we kept our decision quick and concise. Either way, you have lost...
How it was sorting this challenge out...Well this was fun! Shorter than I would have liked, but thanks for having me!
Preach Brother!!I want to be VERY clear. IDI is a force to be met. He may have been cut out early, but you all should watch out. He has purpose now!
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.