aladdin2007
Well-Known Member
Indeed. Disneyland's facade was updated nicely (and that could have easily been done to WDW's as well like they have done with Pooh), but the core ride behind Toad at Magic Kingdom was much better. One of those few shining moments where WDW got something a bit more special that was brought over from Disneyland (basically when MK was treated as its own unique entity and a worthy park in of itself). Even though it was an old fashioned ride with a bunch of cutout props, it just had a lot of heart and was incredibly entertaining.
I don't have much against the Pooh ride in of itself, well with the exception being that it's a damn shame we didn't get the awesome trackless version from Tokyo. I actually love Winnie the Pooh and would have loved a ride to be made out of it. My problem is that this could have gone elsewhere without having to do away with Toad in the first place. They had plenty of space and we'd have had an addition instead of simply a replacement.
Sad to say that this is largely the situation behind the Fantasyland expansion. They're "new" attractions technically, but they're generally replacement for something that was torn down, they're not additions to a pre-existing roster of rides. We got Mermaid and 7 Dwarf coaster but at the expense of Snow White and (even though it has been gone for a long time now) 20k Leagues.
Exactly to everything above, totally agree,,,,and lokheed Im looking forward to your book.