mharrington
Well-Known Member
Roger Rabbit has better brand recognition and I'm sure any legal issues could easily be skirted over, I mean they were still able to build the Roger Rabbit ride in Disneyland not to mention they were still able to actually design some Roger Rabbit themed attractions for the studios a while back. Thematically as well, Roger Rabbit fits in perfectly and is a bit of a no-brainer for a Disney park about Hollywood. The fact that there's a Roger Rabbit short that features a white wooden roller coaster heavily makes it that much more obvious as a choice. In fact Roger Rabbit is pretty deserving of his own land at the Studios.
But that was all back in the 1990s when Disney and Spielberg were on reasonable terms. I don't think they are anymore, unless I'm mistaken. These legal issues were one of the main reasons why I had originally thought of Goofy's Motor Mania in place of Roger Rabbit's Car Toon Spin, because Goofy is a character that Disney actually owned 100% (but then I decided that it looked too much like the Roger Rabbit ride and discarded it, but that's another story).
These legal issues were the main reasons that, in my plans, any suggestions I was offered to fold Roger Rabbit into any proceedings, whatever they may be, were rejected. That's the thing with me: when I do things on these boards, I like to take reality into account before I do anything at all, whether they be access to characters or available real estate. It creates a great deal of frustration, but I'm finicky like that.
Anyway, I have another idea: what if you themed the roller coaster to the one in that Goofy cartoon "Aquamania"?