Milk peanut crunch for me!Butterscotch squares and California brittle are my go-to’s. Rum nougat, marzipan, Boudreaux, and molasses chip are also all on my list.
Milk peanut crunch for me!Butterscotch squares and California brittle are my go-to’s. Rum nougat, marzipan, Boudreaux, and molasses chip are also all on my list.
An opening day DCA with a See's Candy would never have produced Mission Breakout. Ghiradelli could never accomplish that.Fun Fact: When DCA was in the initial planning stages in 1996-97, after being drastically downgraded in scale and budget from its Westcot foundation just a few years earlier, there was a concept for a "California Workplace" area on what is now the World of Color viewing amphitheater.
They had a rendering of it in early WDI artwork for DCA circa 1997. It was to have several sponsored exhibits and small pavilions hosted by California companies. A computer company (Apple?) was being sought, a surfboard maker, and other similar types of stereotypical California commerce and industry. One of the exhibit areas shown in early WDI artwork was a chocolate kitchen and sales counter, and the WDI artwork used the classic See's black-and-white checkerboard theme. Thus heavily implying that See's would have a chocolate demonstration kitchen and sales space in the California Workplace mini-land.
The California Workplace concept floundered, and Paul Pressler's stewardship of the DCA concept in the late 1990's didn't help win over enough new sponsors. The concept was downsized, and on opening day 2001 became solely the Boudin Bakery exhibit and the Mission Tortilla factory tour in the Pacific Wharf area. The San Francisco row houses across from Golden Dreams that were designed to host some of the California Workplace were left empty, and the main area for showrooms and work spaces of the California Workplace along Paradise Bay was turned into a bland cement amphitheater.
But for a brief period circa 1996, someone smart at WDI thought they should try and get See's Candy into DCA!
Shanghai’s a wonderful park that is chock full of truly interesting twists on the formula. They shouldn’t just keep rebuilding Disneyland with every castle park, they SHOULD experiment and try new things and Shanghai does that remarkably well. Hong Kong is living proof that they shouldn’t ever try to one to one an old formula again.I wish Disney would build a park in Texas. Unfortunately I know that if they did, it would suck. Shanghai, DCA, Disney Adventure World, and the planned Abu Dhabi all exhibit Disney's preference for departing from the formula that made Disneyland and other Disney Parks work. There is a rejection at WDI of true themed environments. Instead of a park receiving a central theme, they're amorphous and allowed to add any IP they desire. This is best exemplified with such hit lands as Mickey Avenue, Gardens of Imagination, Adventure Way, and, the greatest example, Performance Corridor. These are non specific lands with no time period, no story, no place, all so that they can be shaped and changed in whatever way Disney chooses. An anarchic model of theme park design. If Disney built a park in Texas, I'm confident that's what we would receive, not the kind of park that makes Disneyland, Epcot, Animal Kingdom, or Disney Sea special and good.
Shanghai was built for the Chinese. I am not Chinese. I have no interest in Shanghai.Shanghai’s a wonderful park that is chock full of truly interesting twists on the formula. They shouldn’t just keep rebuilding Disneyland with every castle park, they SHOULD experiment and try new things and Shanghai does that remarkably well. Hong Kong is living proof that they shouldn’t ever try to one to one an old formula again.
Shanghai's layout is certainly bizarre. It really just appears as if it's a park of several wienies with little else. There's the castle, Tron, and Adventureland rapids, but other than that the park is very sparse and open. Mickey Ave and Pirate's Cove are really the only part of the park that actually resembles a land. Where are all the buildings in the park? How can you create a themed environment with just one flagship attraction? Shanghai's Tomorrowland is certainly the most egregious in this as there really is nothing to sell the theme besides Tron's overwhelming presence. I don't see how these places could ever feel transportive when there is just nothing to go off of. Grizzly Gulch and Mystic Point in Hong Kong have the same problem. It’s like if Frontierland was just Big Thunder, a saloon, and a wagon. That’s just not how theme parks are supposed to work. That’s not immersive.I really don’t like aesthetic of Shanghai Disneyland. However their castle is nice and realistic of the bunch. I hate how none of the lands really flow. Hodgepodge of ideas and IP slap in the parks. For that reason, I absolutely have no desire to visit. I rather just see Shanghai itself.
Thank you!!!!
And, yes, we are absolutely so lucky! I have memberships to just about everything. For as much as the folks who live here complain, the membership benefits to the museums and gardens cannot be beat.
The WDFM is a very special place to me, not just because of the Disney factor, but because the Presidio is a huge part of my family history (my great grandparents are buried in the National Cemetery, my grandfather walked across the Golden Gate Bridge the day it opened). The WDFM always has these wonderful talks and events with lots of Disney royalty. I think the Jungle Book exhibition gala with Andreas Deja and some of the living cast members and artists who worked on it was my all time most treasured.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.