I'm not saying it doesn't serve it well. But that doesn't invalidate what Bob said.
Ok so then explain why POTC is NOT brilliant storytelling. What do you and Bob think could be done better?
I'm not saying it doesn't serve it well. But that doesn't invalidate what Bob said.
As @Disney Analyst said it better than me I'm going to just quote their post right here -Ok so then explain why POTC is NOT brilliant storytelling.
I can only say that when I watched the full episode (both of them), before social media picked this up and started raging, I found his comments innocuous. He already admits it’s his favourite attraction (several times), and mentioning that it’s not the most brilliant storytelling is objectively true. He never said it doesn’t tell a story at all, we all know it does. But it’s in the abstract, and yet it's very effective, and executed brilliantly.
If anything him recognizing that should mean he understands why it's a huge success. Would be great if that meant they'd build more rides like the ol' days. But alas.
But of course the rage machine picked it up on twitter, and twisted it into something bigger and worse than it ever could have been. Grifters with blue checks working hard to make money off engagement.
Who said it had to be done better?What do you and Bob think could be done better?
As @Disney Analyst said it better than me I'm going to just quote their post right here -
Who said it had to be done better?
As @Disney Analyst said it better than me I'm going to just quote their post right here -
Who said it had to be done better?
Nope, I just agree with that they said.Cheap out.
Nope, I just agree with that they said.
Its an abstract type of storytelling, it however is the type that draws criticism for not being brilliant storytelling because there is no clear story being told, ie its abstract. The rephrase what Bob said in another way using the same meaning, its not the most clear way of storytelling.
Not brilliant can also mean "not clear".Not brilliant implies something can be done better. Stop playing dumb.
Or you can just say he chose the wrong words to describe what he was trying to say. Instead of doubling down that what he said was accurate.
Agreed, just like much around here.Much ado about nothing.
Much ado about nothing.
Not Brilliant storytelling to Bob means there is no obvious linear story. And that’s its a more passive experience by modern standards. As the CEO of Disney and leader of the company while many dud attractions have debuted, Id probably choose a different way of phrasing my thoughts when referring to a 55 year old + classic and one of the greatest attractions of all time.
LMAO, I didn't realize I needed to be invited to respond to posts here. I thought it was a free forum to respond and discuss.And who is it you think that brings all the “ado.”
Above is my original post. Who but Irish could turn this into a back n forth? He spends half of his time here responding to my posts that weren’t even addressed to him to begin with. Notice that nearly all his posts are replies to other posts or that he rarely creates any sort of content. He just sits around waiting and salivating for the next debate. I don’t know. Maybe because he’s a stockholder he feels the need to defend them at every turn.
LMAO, I didn't realize I needed to be invited to respond to posts here. I thought it was a free forum to respond and discuss.
Also I create "content" all the time, I'm not only in this forum my friend.
I do all the time, you just obviously don't pay attention. For example just yesterday I posted a linked story about Scarlet Witch's temporary return to AC and engaged in conversation about it.Of course it is but it seems that’s what you spend the majority of your time doing. I don’t see very many posts of you sharing ideas, reviews, links, feelings etc about the parks. Only when they are part of a debate and in response to someone else’s opinion.
I do all the time, you just obviously don't pay attention. For example just yesterday I posted a linked story about Scarlet Witch's temporary return to AC and engaged in conversation about it.
Also so what if I did only want to engage in discussions on what others posts? I didn't realize that was somehow against the rules of this site.
Except its not lopsided, if you actually paid attention to my posting habits. Because you'd know that I'm active not only here both other parts of this site.Just seems very lopsided is all. But if that’s what you enjoy doing more power to ya. I just think it’s worth calling out when someone posts something like “much ado about nothing.” I think a posters posting history should considered.
Silly question incoming: Can Jim Hill be trusted? I have heard little murmurs that some of the stories he told weren't actually proven in anyway. Is there anywhere else these amazing details can be backed up or is it just a "source: trust me and my knowledge" situation? I really appreciate you locating this for me, it helps out tremendously.The Jim Hill article all about Michael Jackson and Plectu has been located! I did not imagine this! Took me a lot of internet searching.
@Shishagumi
![]()
Michael Jackson THE IMMORTAL World Tour & Fan Fest makes for one Thriller of a holiday season this year in Las Vegas - Jim Hill Media
Here's a fun factoid for all of you Michael Jackson fans out there: Following the success of "Captain EO," Michael Jackson and the Imagineers actually spent about six months in the late 1980s developing a follow-up attraction. One that would have reimagined the King of Pop as a three-armed...jimhillmedia.com
Give him a click but also going to have the relevant parts below for archival purposes
"Here's a fun factoid for all of you Michael Jackson fans out
there: Following the success of "Captain EO," Michael Jackson and the
Imagineers actually spent about six months in the late 1980s developing a
follow-up attraction. One that would have reimagined the King of Pop as a
three-armed outer-space impresario called P.T. Quantum.
The basic premise behind this proposed Tomorrowland![]()
The "crash-landed" version of the retooled exterior of Carousel of Progress theater-go-
round show building. Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
attraction (which was to have been built inside of the old Carousel of Progress
theater-go-round building) was that P.T. Quantum's space-going-circus had accidently
crash-landed at Disneyland. And in order to raise the money necessary to make
repairs to his now-damaged starship, this intergalactic ringmaster was – for
the first time ever – going to allow humans to come see his out-of-this-world assortment
of acts.
Among the "performers" that were to have been featured in this![]()
A sleeker version of P.T. Quantum's interstellar circus reveals where this retooled attraction
would have been located in relation to all of the other rides & shows found in Disneyland's
Tomorrowland section. Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
Audio Animatronic extravaganza was a this multi-ton muck monster. Who-after she
slowly hauled herself out of the ooze that filled an onstage – was to have sung
a beautifully operatic quintet with her five mouths.
But the show's finale was always supposed to be a![]()
The outer space opera sequence that was planned for the P. T. Quantum show. Please
note the large-mouthed diva at the very center of this image surrounded by her swamp-
dwelling orchestra. Which was to have performed a musical number that Danny
Elfman was going to write for this proposed Tomorrowland addition.
Copyright Disney Enterprises, Inc. All rights reserved
performance by P.T. himself. Who – of course – was going to be voiced by
Michael Jackson. The only problem was that the Imagineers could never get a AA
figure to do what Jackson did onstage. Which was to dazzle the crowd with a
high energy performance that skillfully combined dancing, singing and
showmanship."
View attachment 892116
My post above this had a different imagineer mention an MJ show in the carousel of progress theater, though called it Star Palace, and at an official Disney event. So that lends some credibility.Silly question incoming: Can Jim Hill be trusted? I have heard little murmurs that some of the stories he told weren't actually proven in anyway. Is there anywhere else these amazing details can be backed up or is it just a "source: trust me and my knowledge" situation? I really appreciate you locating this for me, it helps out tremendously.
To me it seemed clear 20 years ago that no one fully trusted Jim Hill.Silly question incoming: Can Jim Hill be trusted? I have heard little murmurs that some of the stories he told weren't actually proven in anyway. Is there anywhere else these amazing details can be backed up or is it just a "source: trust me and my knowledge" situation? I really appreciate you locating this for me, it helps out tremendously.
Well….It'd be hilarious if we found out Irish and blu were the same person just arguing with themselves.
Register on WDWMAGIC. This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.